Thanks Fabricio. If anyone has further input, please use Fabricio's
version as the starting point for redlines.
Best, Lisa
At 08:37 AM 3/5/2018, Vayra, Fabricio (Perkins Coie) wrote:
Thanks, Lisa. My
additional thoughts in redline in the attached.
From: Gnso-rds-pdp-4
[
mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-4-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa
Phifer
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 7:21 PM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] Please review attached v2 answers
Importance: High
DT4,
Attached is an updated draft of answers to questions we have been asked
to answer no later than 7 March for discussion at ICANN61.
In this draft, I have applied the changes suggested by Erica
below.
Does anyone have any further edits to the attached draft - especially to
address the questions raised below?
Please supply any edits by COB Monday 5 March.
Also, will any of you be on the 6 March WG call to provide a status
update on behalf of this drafting team?
Best, Lisa
At 07:15 AM 2/28/2018, Lisa Phifer wrote:
Thanks very much Erica –
Does aanyone have any suggested text for why the registrars need to be
identified or contacted (and by whom), the expectations of the
registrars, etc?
We may also want to add something about the benefit to both buyer and
seller – a point raised on yesterday’s WG calG call but after I took
my first cut at that draft.
Best, Lisa
From: Erica Varlese
[mailto:erica@my.blog ]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 5:53 AM
To: Lisa Phifer
Cc:
gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] ICANN61 Prep Assignment
Hi Lisa,
Thank you for writing the first draft!
I read through and only have one minor suggestion. On the following line,
I would suggest adding that both the buyer and the seller expect
communication to be reliably relayed.
> In the case of relayed communication, the buyer **and seller**
expect communication to be reliably relayed by the Privacy/Proxy to the
authentic entity who has legal rights to sell the domain name.
Regarding the final question, I believe the answer is yes. One the seller
initiates the transfer, the registrar should complete the translate
process post-acquisition.
Curious to hear others' thoughts too!
Best,
Erica
Erica Varlese | .blog Shepherd @ KKWT
Email: erica@my.blog
Skype: evarlese
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Lisa Phifer
<lisa@corecom.com>
wrote:
Drafting Team 4,
Thanks again to those of you who prepped to provide an intro to DN
Purchase/Sale during the past few WG calls.
As those who were on today̢۪s call heaheard, we have decided to take a
week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting
team mode.
Our team̢۪s assignment is to reexaexamine our past output on DN
Purchase/Sale:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/74580010/DraftingTeam4-DNPurchaseSale-Purpose-v9-clean.pdf
to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually:
- Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be
identified and/or contacted for each purpose?
- What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each
of those entities?
- What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name?
To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions
and produce output over the next week – ideally by 55 March but no later
than 7 March.
We know this is a tall order, give a short timeframe. However, the
leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61
more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific
idea.
To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers,
prepared by me from our past output, and raising a few potential gaps for
discussion.
To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%20Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf
If you were unable to attend today’s ¢s WG call, please catch up by
reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript:
https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B
To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this
assignment within the next 24 hours.
If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached
first draft, even better! I encourage you to share them in reply to
this message, copying the DT mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on
this new assignment.
Best, Lisa
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-4 mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-4
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-4 mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-4
NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential
information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender
by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments
without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.