Hi Lisa, thanks. I can break away from the IPC open meeting to have a call about this on Tuesday North America AM sometime, it looks like.

Brian

Brian Scarpelli
Senior Policy Counsel
517-507-1446 | bscarpelli@actonline.org
ACT | The App Association

From: gnso-rds-pdp-4-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-4-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Phifer
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 12:58 AM
To: gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] Feedback from Saturday session and prep for Wednesday session

All,

I realize that most of you are attending ICANN60 remotely this week, so I wanted to provide you with an update on yesterday’s F2F session.

You can find the recording of yesterday’s session on the wiki meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/eyMhB. Notes and a transcript will be posted there by Monday.

In short, based on yesterday’s session and discussion of other team’s outputs, we may wish to review this team’s output to ask ourselves:

• Are the tasks covered in our output so diverse and distinct that we may have more than one purpose? If so, how would we split them up?
• Is there any overlaps with other purposes? If so, which purposes covered by other teams are related or overlap?
• Is there any data collected specifically for this purpose? If so, which data? Or does this purpose use only data collected for other purposes?
• How might we reframe our summary definition in this way: “Information collected to enable contact between the registrant and <who> <to accomplish what>”

We have an opportunity now to refine our output prior to Wednesday’s F2F session to answer the above questions.

I believe that Erica may be the only DT4 member here in Abu Dhabi. Erica, let’s try to find a time to briefly meet in person here to prep for Wednesday’s session.

In addition, would any of you be available for a DT4 call on Tuesday (am in North America, pm here in Abu Dhabi) to discuss the above questions, or can we try to answer these via email?

Best, Lisa