Thanks very much Erica –
 
Does anyone have any suggested text for why the registrars need to be identified or contacted (and by whom), the expectations of the registrars, etc?
 
We may also want to add something about the benefit to both buyer and seller – a point raised on yesterday’s WG call but after I took my first cut at that draft.
 
Best, Lisa
 
 
From: Erica Varlese [mailto:erica@my.blog ]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 5:53 AM
To: Lisa Phifer
Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] ICANN61 Prep Assignment
 
Hi Lisa,
 
Thank you for writing the first draft!
 
I read through and only have one minor suggestion. On the following line, I would suggest adding that both the buyer and the seller expect communication to be reliably relayed.
 
> In the case of relayed communication, the buyer **and seller** expect communication to be reliably relayed by the Privacy/Proxy to the authentic entity who has legal rights to sell the domain name.
 
Regarding the final question, I believe the answer is yes. One the seller initiates the transfer, the registrar should complete the translate process post-acquisition.
 
Curious to hear others' thoughts too!
 
Best,
Erica
 
 

Erica Varlese | .blog Shepherd @ KKWT
Email: erica@my.blog
Skype: evarlese
 
 
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Lisa Phifer <lisa@corecom.com> wrote:
Drafting Team 4,
 
Thanks again to those of you who prepped to provide an intro to DN Purchase/Sale during the past few WG calls.
 
As those who were on today’s call heard, we have decided to take a week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting team mode.
 
Our team’s assignment is to reexamine our past output on DN Purchase/Sale:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/74580010/DraftingTeam4-DNPurchaseSale-Purpose-v9-clean.pdf
 
to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually:

1. Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be identified and/or contacted for each purpose?
2. What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each of those entities?
3. What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name?

 
To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions and produce output over the next week – ideally by 5 March but no later than 7 March.
 
We know this is a tall order, give a short timeframe. However, the leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61 more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific idea.
 
To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers, prepared by me from our past output, and raising a few potential gaps for discussion.
 
To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions:
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%20Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf
 
If you were unable to attend today’s WG call, please catch up by reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript:
https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B
 
To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this assignment within the next 24 hours.
 
If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached first draft, even better!  I encourage you to share them in reply to this message, copying the DT mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
 
Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on this new assignment.
 
Best, Lisa
 
 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-4 mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-4
 
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-4 mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-4@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-4