Dear Team 4,

 

In prep for tomorrow’s F2F session, do an of you have thoughts on Paul’s comments below (forwarded from WG mailing list)?

 

Looking forward to having you all dial into the session remotely to support Erica as she presents this team’s output:

Finally, please respond by the end of this week to this Doodle to schedule one last DT4 call (30-60 minutes) for next week: https://doodle.com/poll/dgbhy7tazd4wwfid

 

Best, Lisa

 

 

From: Paul Keating [mailto:paul@law.es]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2017 7:29 PM
To: Lisa Phifer
Cc: RDS PDP WG
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Drafting Team 4 Output

 

Excellent work Lisa,

 

Comment:  the reference to a “business domain” is odd as transactions are not so limited.

 

Tasks: Parties purchasing or selling a business domain name often engage in the following tasks.”

 

 

Question:  did your group consider the uses by entities involved in transactions?  For example, my clients include:

 

Escrow companies

Finance companies

Individual lenders

 

These people not only need to confirm ownership (marketable title) but also perform KYC (know your customer) and AML (anti money laundering) verification which includes comparing the domain registrant to the payor/payee.

 

Money lenders need relevant data to perfect security interests.

Sent from my iPad


On 26 Oct 2017, at 17:19, Lisa Phifer <lisa@corecom.com> wrote:

All,

Drafting team 4's output on business domain name purchase/sale has been posted for WG discussion at ICANN60:

https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69280635/DraftingTeam4-DNPurchaseSale-Definition-v5-clean.doc

Regards,
Lisa

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg