Hi Chuck, I think this Regulatory Purpose document well reflects the diversity of opinions in the comments you included.  I'm now working on the Contractual Compliance document which I think would benefit from a similar format. 

To All, it's hard to enter a group's work midstream. There is much I am trying to understand, and assumptions and definitions to decipher. I appreciate our discussions!

Best, Kathy

If anyone objects to anything in this version, please communicate what you object to and why not later than 1700 UTC (12 on EST, 9 am PST) tomorrow (Wednesday, March 7).  If no objections are communicated, leave the comments I inserted and send this version as our final deliverable to the WG list.  If any objections are communicated, I will note those in the final version and send that version to the WG list.

 

Thanks to everyone for the thought you put into this.  We still need to identify someone to present our final version in the WG meeting on Saturday morning; in that session other DT6 members may add their comments and WG members and guests will be given an opportunity to discuss it.  Keeping in mind that this exercise is intended to help us continue our deliberation on whether the Regulatory Purpose is a legitimate purpose for processing any RDS data, the answers we give and any objections will hopefully contribute to that deliberation when we get to it.

 

Note that I did not include many of Kathy’s comments because they are more appropriate for our later deliberation on this purpose than they are for this exercise.  This does not at imply that they are not important; they are just not directly relevant to this exercise and will be more appropriately discuss when we deliberate directly on the Regulatory Purpose.

 

Chuck

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-5 mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-5