Thanks Chuck. As I noted during our informal DT6 meeting the other day, I personally support including the Regulatory purpose within the Legal Actions purpose. Looking forward to seeing others' feedback on the updated DT6 doc, and on the question of absorbing the Regulatory purpose. Best, Griffin From: gnso-rds-pdp-6-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-6-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of consult@cgomes.com Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 6:41 AM To: gnso-rds-pdp-6@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rds-pdp-6] Doodle Poll Thanks to Juan, Roger & Griffin for responding to this doodle poll for a team meeting next week: Doodle: https://doodle.com/poll/uik6ggrwb98z2ubn. I request the rest of you to complete the poll. We will use the call to finalize our deliverable; if we are able to finalize the deliverable on list before the call, we will cancel it. Reminder: Griffin distributed a revised version of the deliverable yesterday. Please review it and provide your feedback as soon as possible. In addition, the idea of combining the Regulatory purpose with the Legal Actions purpose has been proposed by some members of DT5; please comment on that idea. To facilitate your consideration of that, here is a draft (not yet finalized) version of the revised definition of the Legal Actions purpose: "The "legal actions" purpose of RDS includes assisting certain parties( or their legal representatives, agents or service providers) to investigate and enforce civil and criminal laws, protect recognized legal rights, address online abuse or contractual compliance matters, or to assist parties defending against these kinds of activities as a matter of due process, in each case with respect to all stages associated with such activities, including investigative stages; communications with registrants, registration authorities or hosting providers, or administrative or technical personnel relevant to the domain at issue; arbitrations; administrative proceedings; civil litigations (private or public); and criminal prosecutions." Chuck