Moving Things Along .. Next Steps
All Thanks for all your hard work over the last few weeks. You’ve all been fantastic and it is appreciated. So what now? On tomorrow’s call we’re going to start moving towards bringing back the input from the subgroups to the main group, so if you could consider the following it would be helpful: During the 20th April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed during last week’s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each of you try to answer this question: Which “top 5" inputs summarised by this team are likely to be the most helpful to this PDP and why? For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP? Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work plan? Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG call. Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call. We will not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at least begin this discussion. Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
My initial thought are going to the mail on the list last week with the new EU laws coming and which will affect not just this group but probably the other groups too. The document are massive but impact our industry in a big way over the next years. Has it been put on the list of documents? And there clearly must be more than one going on it, some with legal background are maybe better to look at it than this group. Can we get a document with all the summarise? now they are spred out in a lot of mails -- Med vänliga hälsningar / Kind Regards / Med vennlig hilsen Benny Samuelsen Registry Manager - Domainexpert Nordreg AB - ICANN accredited registrar IANA-ID: 638 Phone: +46.852529100 Direct: +47.32260201 Mobile: +47.40410200
On 19 Apr 2016, at 16:18, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
All
Thanks for all your hard work over the last few weeks. You’ve all been fantastic and it is appreciated.
So what now?
On tomorrow’s call we’re going to start moving towards bringing back the input from the subgroups to the main group, so if you could consider the following it would be helpful:
During the 20th April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed during last week’s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each of you try to answer this question:
Which “top 5" inputs summarised by this team are likely to be the most helpful to this PDP and why?
For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP?
Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work plan?
Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG call.
Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call.
We will not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at least begin this discussion.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-data mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-data@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-data
Thanks for this - it will give shape to our WG’s discussions. First, though, could we agree on the mission of this group - to be clear about what we are supposed to be doing - or not. My understanding was that our first task is simply to identify the data that is collected by registries and registrars, and why it is collected. My nomination for one of the ‘top five’ documents is SAC 54. The reason is that it lists all of the data (not just the ‘whois’ data required under the RAA, but the data used for traffic management, etc, etc). And each data element is listed under a general heading of how the data element is used - operational, etc. My other picks for the ‘top 5’ would include the Whoise Registrant Study, the Whois Task Force Final Report, and perhaps as or more importantly, the EWG Final report, since that team had to go through a very similar exercise. At this stage, I am not sure that the range of documents on data protection should be in the Top 5 unless the task of this group is to also identify those data elements that would amount to ‘personal information’ under data protection laws and therefore, be the subject of discussion on the data elements that should/should not be publicly available. Hope that helps the discussion Holly On 20 Apr 2016, at 12:18 am, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
All
Thanks for all your hard work over the last few weeks. You’ve all been fantastic and it is appreciated.
So what now?
On tomorrow’s call we’re going to start moving towards bringing back the input from the subgroups to the main group, so if you could consider the following it would be helpful:
During the 20th April RDS PDP WG call, each team will be asked to report on its progress and share preliminary thoughts about the questions posed during last week’s WG call. To kick-start this discussion, I ask that each of you try to answer this question:
Which “top 5" inputs summarised by this team are likely to be the most helpful to this PDP and why?
For example, does the input define potential requirements that this WG should take into consideration during phase 1 of this PDP?
Does the input identify dependencies that will shape our work plan?
Our team will have an opportunity to share initial answers during the WG call.
Please reply to this list today with your own initial thoughts so that we can prepare to contribute to discussion during the WG call.
We will not be expected to have a team-agreed answer this week, but we need to at least begin this discussion.
Regards
Michele
-- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-data mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-data@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-data
participants (4)
-
benny＠nordreg.se -
Holly Raiche -
Lisa Phifer -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight