Hello Privacy Sub Team,
I apologize for the late notice on this. I had hoped that David would have sent this earlier but for some unknown reason, probably beyond his control, he was unable to attend the Leadership Call
yesterday and hasn’t responded to email messages since then.
On today’s call you as a team will have 45 minutes to discuss the questions listed below. The team will be asked to formulate responses to each of the questions in the coming week and today’s meeting will
be used to get that process started. Please think about all the summaries of the documents that have been reviewed for “privacy” and be prepared to share your initial responses to the questions on today’s call. Hopefully that will motivate list discussion
in the coming week so that the team can present more complete responses in the WG call on May 3rd.
Note that the Privacy Team is scheduled for the following time slot today:
16.15 – 17.00 UTC. If David is able to participate, I will let him lead the discussion if he is able to do so. If not, I will do it.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Chuck
Privacy Sub-Team – Draft 25 April 2016
Each
team
to consider
their total
output to
address
the following
questions[1]:
(i)
Did
this
input inventory
produce
any insights
to
inform the
WG’s work
plan?
Draft response:
(ii)
Which
inputs are
likely
to be
the most
relevant during
WG deliberations
and why[2]?
Draft response (based on input received during 20/4 meeting):
·
SAC 054, because [to be completed]
·
EWG Recommendations, because [to be completed]
(iii)
Which
inputs, if
any, generated
the most
discussion within
the small
team?
Draft response:
(iv)
Which
inputs may
be obsolete
or super-ceded
by subsequent
work?
Draft response:
(v)
What
input gaps,
if any,
may
need
to be
addressed
later?
Draft response:
(vi)
Other
key
takeaways from
this input
inventory
the team
wishes
to share
with the
WG
Draft response:
[1]
Please see ‘Plan
to
consolidate
summaries and
complete & present team
outputs’
for further details on the overall agreed approach for sub-teams.
[2]
Note, this does not mean that other inputs are not considered – this is just intended to facilitate the WG’s prioritization of documents to consider first in relation to the finalization of the work plan and subsequent deliberations.