Hi, team-

Speaking of these new EU data protection rules, I just thought I'd ask if we had access to a resource.

Over the weekend I stumbled across this email chain on the listserv for another working group. In it, the VP UN and IGO Engagement shares a file downloaded from Cullen's regulatory intelligence service. I wasn't aware that ICANN subscribed to Cullen, but in the file shared there is a hyperlink to a full summary of the General Data Protection Regulation that Cullen has prepared. It is behind their paywall, but if ICANN subscribes to this service, might it be possible for us to table their summary? I have read other reports produced by Cullen and they are usually of a very high quality and may help us identify where, within the 400 pages or so of this new regulation, we should be focusing our energy. I am not sure of the terms of ICANN's subscription to this tool, so perhaps we cannot share it publicly, but just thought I would ask. Thank you.

Best wishes,

Ayden

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 10:45 PM, Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels@gmail.com wrote:
So the updated EU data protection and privacy regulations are now agreed.  Some rules include: “.......

  • - a right to be forgotten,
  • - “clear and affirmative consent” to the processing of private data by the person concerned,
  • - a right to transfer your data to another service provider,
  • - the right to know when your data has been hacked,
  • - ensuring that privacy policies are explained in clear and understandable language, and
  • - stronger enforcement and fines up to 4% of firms' total worldwide annual turnover, as a deterrent to breaking the rules  
  • .......”


-Carlton




==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:33 PM, nathalie coupet via Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy <gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Lisa,

Here is the final summary. 

Best,
 
Nathalie 


On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:27 PM, nathalie coupet <nathaliecoupet@yahoo.com> wrote:


Hi Lisa,

Will do.
 
Nathalie 


On Monday, April 18, 2016 2:12 PM, Lisa Phifer <lisa@corecom.com> wrote:


Hi Nathalie,

I suspect that you may have copied the text below from the PPSAI PDP report (summarized by Steve Metalitz) instead of the survey you'd volunteered to summarize:

EWG Research: WHOIS Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Practices Survey
https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/45744698/EWG%20PP%20PROVIDER%20QUESTIONNAIRE%20SUMMARY%2014%20March%202014.pdf

Please take another look at the above survey and summarize what it attempted to examine. While it may not be reasonable to try to concisely summarize survey findings, it would be very helpful to let the WG know what this survey asked privacy and proxy providers about.

Thanks
Lisa


At 08:30 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote:
Here are my summaries.

Privacy and Proxy Services
P/P services should remain available to registrants irrespective of their status as commercial or non-commercial organizations or as individuals. Further, P/P registrations should not be limited to private individuals who use their domains for non-commercial purposes....
P/P customer data is to be validated and verified in a manner consistent with the requirements outlined in the WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification of the 2013 RAA





_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy mailing list
Gnso-rds-pdp-privacy@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-privacy