Dear All,

Please find below the notes from today?s purpose sub-team meeting as well as the latest draft responses to the questions attached.  As a reminder, you are encouraged to provide input by the end of this week (Friday 29 April) in view of finalising the sub-teams input to the full WG by the next WG meeting.

Best regards,

Lisa

Notes

• For the latest versions of the check lists and summaries, please see https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw . 
• Membership of the sub-teams: https://community.icann.org/x/DDCAAw

Purpose Sub-Team:

• Roll call will be taken from Adobe Connect room
• Reminder, please complete / update SOIs
• Draft response displayed in Adobe Connect room includes documents identified as most relevant on the email list and why, as a starting point for discussion  during this call.
• Responses were updated to correct A29 references and to add A29 3/2013 and Green and White papers to the list.
• If additional docs suggested by Kathy are not already on the purpose team's inputs list, add then and copy summaries from privacy team summaries. 
• It was noted that the team needs to ensure that the A29 docs listed as most important are those directly relevant to purpose. (It is believed they are.)
• Additional input documents are welcome at any time during the PDP, but we do need to wrap up this input inventory this week to return to full WG mode and the PDP WG's work plan
• Remaining assigned summaries to be added to consolidated summaries PDF.  Note: A29 3/2013 summary was in fact already submitted and added to consolidated PDF last week.
• Volunteers asked to take a look at the consolidated purpose team summaries (posted to mailing list and also on wiki at https://community.icann.org/x/p4xlAw as noted above) to identify any lengthy excerpts that need abbreviating or bullet points added to tie the excerpt to its relevance in answering the charter question addressed by this team
• Team members may also wish to cross-check the list of input documents to ensure that the end user's  expectations, fears, reactions, etc, are encompassed within inputs identified. (For example, the  Individual Internet User purpose described in the EWG report and the blog post by Carlton Samuels.) If not, note this as an input gap.
• Team will continue discussion on email list and come to conclusions about answers to questions by Friday of this week for discussion with full WG.
• Submit comments / edits to draft responses by the end of this week in view of finalising input by next week's meeting.