Hi Marika,

It appears the community edits to the 2^nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement. 

The core problem will be to “deal with” the tension – were we not going to use “accommodate” or some other wording?  I personally think “take into consideration” or “ease” would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN’s remit.

Thanks,

Sara

From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement

Dear All,

Following last week’s RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter.

Best regards,

Marika

Marika Konings

Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.