Correct.

Perhaps the folks on this list want to observe how Eurid treats Thick WHOIS data as Greg mentioned.

https://whois.eurid.eu/en/?domain=vwl.eu

That is one of my domain names.

Best regards,

Theo


On 22-1-2017 22:16, Greg Aaron wrote:

Shane, you said that “with regards to ‘thin data’ is that we need *some* purpose for both gathering and publishing the information, because otherwise privacy laws may prohibit companies from gathering or publishing it.”

 

You may be making an erroneous assumption.  AFAIK, thin data is not protected by privacy laws.  Generally, privacy laws are designed to protect personally identifiable information, and not all types of information.  Privacy laws allow the _collection_ personal information for legitimate purposes.   Privacy laws are not designed to prohibit the _publication_ of non-personally-identifiable information. 

 

This is why ccTLDs in countries with strong privacy laws (such as in the EU) DO collect and publish thin data in their WHOIS systems  They do it because it’s allowed, and because there are legitimate reasons to collect AND publish it. 

And sometimes they publish thick data.  For example you will see registrant and contact information below.  That’s published because companies are not individuals.   

 

All best,

--Greg

 

Domain name:

        virgin.co.uk

    Registrant:

        Virgin Enterprises Limited

    Registrant type:

        Unknown

    Registrant's address:

        The Battleship Building

        179 Harrow Road

        London

        EN

        W2 6NB

        United Kingdom

    Data validation:

        Nominet was able to match the registrant's name and address against a 3rd party data source on 21-Apr-2015

    Registrar:

        Corporation Service Company (UK) Limited [Tag = CSC-CORP-DOMAINS]

        URL: http://www.cscprotectsbrands.com

    Relevant dates:

        Registered on: before Aug-1996

        Expiry date:  07-Nov-2017

        Last updated:  03-Nov-2015

    Registration status:

        Registered until expiry date.

    Name servers:

        a4.nstld.com

        f4.nstld.com

        g4.nstld.com

        h4.nstld.com

        j4.nstld.com

        k4.nstld.com

        l4.nstld.com

 

Domain name:           virgin.ca

Domain status:         registered

Creation date:         2001/01/31

Expiry date:           2017/03/10

Updated date:          2015/02/02

DNSSEC:                Unsigned

Registrar:

    Name:              CSC Corporate Domains (Canada) Company

    Number:            2397937

Registrant:

    Name:              Virgin Enterprises Limited TMA 383374

Administrative contact:

    Name:              Ms Victoria Carrington

    Postal address:    112 Kent Street, Suite 2001

                       Ottawa ON K1P 5P2 Canada

    Phone:             1 613 2325300

    Fax:               1 613 5639231

    Email:             email@shapirocohen.com

Technical contact:

    Name:              Russell Berman

    Postal address:    The School House

                       50 Brook Green

                       London EN W6 7RR United Kingdom

    Phone:             +44.2073132000

    Fax:               +44.2031263608

    Email:             email@virgin.com

Name servers:

    a4.nstld.com

    f4.nstld.com

    g4.nstld.com

    h4.nstld.com

    j4.nstld.com

    k4.nstld.com

    l4.nstld.com

 

 

domain:      virgin.fr

status:      ACTIVE

hold:        NO

holder-c:    VEL21-FRNIC

admin-c:     RD2263-FRNIC

tech-c:      DA4698-FRNIC

zone-c:      NFC1-FRNIC

nsl-id:      NSL17525-FRNIC

registrar:   CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC.

Expiry Date: 11/12/2017

created:     28/06/1995

last-update: 07/12/2016

source:      FRNIC

ns-list:     NSL17525-FRNIC

nserver:     a4.nstld.com

nserver:     f4.nstld.com

nserver:     g4.nstld.com

nserver:     h4.nstld.com

nserver:     j4.nstld.com

nserver:     k4.nstld.com

nserver:     l4.nstld.com

source:      FRNIC

registrar:   CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC.

type:        Isp Option 1

address:     2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400

address:     DE 19808 WILMINGTON

country:     US

phone:       +1 302 636 5401

fax-no:      +1 302 636 5454

e-mail:      email@cscinfo.com

website:     http://www.csccorporatedomains.com

anonymous:   NO

registered:  17/10/2006

source:      FRNIC

nic-hdl:     VEL21-FRNIC

type:        ORGANIZATION

contact:     Virgin Enterprises Ltd.

address:     120 Campden Hill Road

address:     W6 7RR London

country:     GB

phone:       +44 2073132000

fax-no:      +44 2031263610

e-mail:      email@virgin.com

registrar:   CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC.

changed:     03/10/2012 email@nic.fr

anonymous:   NO

obsoleted:   NO

eligstatus:  ok

eligsource:  REGISTRAR

eligdate:    03/10/2012 21:10:50

source:      FRNIC

nic-hdl:     RD2263-FRNIC

type:        PERSON

contact:     Rebecca Delorey

address:     Partner/Avocat associe

address:     Gilbey Delorey 69 rue de Richelieu

address:     75002 Paris

country:     FR

phone:       +33 1 56 02 62 00

fax-no:      +33 1 56 02 62 10

e-mail:      email@gilbeydehaas.com

registrar:   CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC.

changed:     08/09/2010 email@nic.fr

anonymous:   NO

obsoleted:   NO

source:      FRNIC

nic-hdl:     DA4698-FRNIC

type:        PERSON

contact:     Domain Administrator

address:     Virgin Enterprises Ltd.

address:     The School House

address:     50 Brook Green

address:     W6 7RR London EN

country:     GB

phone:       +44 2073132000

fax-no:      +44 2031263608

e-mail:      email@virgin.com

registrar:   CSC CORPORATE DOMAINS INC.

changed:     26/09/2011 email@nic.fr

anonymous:   NO

obsoleted:   NO

source:      FRNIC

City: Augustfehn I

CountryCode: DE

Phone: +49 4489 941030

Fax: +49 4489 9410369

Email: email@kataplonk.de

Changed: 2013-08-03T15:21:00+02:00

 

**********************************

Greg Aaron

Vice-President, Product Management

iThreat Cyber Group / Cybertoolbelt.com

mobile: +1.215.858.2257

**********************************

The information contained in this message is privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 1:33 PM
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
Cc: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] FW: Now open: 18 January Poll on Purpose

 

Shane,

 

First, I would say that all legitimate purposes need to be catered for, so I don't think we can agree there. :-(

 

Second, I think the garbage can top analogy illustrates the difference between purpose and use.  It is not a legitimate purpose of a garbage can top to be used as a sled, even if it is a potential use.  (I don't think we can say that it is a legitimate use either, but hopefully we don't have to parse that issue, at least not yet.  In college, we used to sled down the hill in the middle of campus on cafeteria trays (from the cafeteria conveniently located near the top of the hill.  This was definitely not a legitimate purpose of those sleds.  We students may have thought this was a legitimate use of the trays, but I doubt this view was shared by cafeteria staff or university administration.  Or maybe we thought it was an illegitimate use, which made it more exciting (it's been a while...).)

 

I share your view that the need for the information is indisputable -- so we can agree there.  :-)

 

Nonetheless, I think there are good reasons that it is important to identify the legitimate purposes of the data is collected, and to accommodate those purposes.  Indeed, this is one of the essential purposes of this Working Group.

 

Greg

 

 

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:03 AM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:

Greg,

If we can say that not all legitimate purposes have to be catered for,
then I agree with you. :)

If we say that tracking down the registrar of a domain as part of
trademark research is a legitimate purpose, that does not mean that we
have to design the system for this purpose, right?

To try an analogy: We can recognize that using the plastic top of a
garbage can as a sled is legitimate, but we don't insist on designing
lids with sledding in mind.

Full disclosure: My own take on the "legitimate purpose" discussion
with regards to "thin data" is that we need *some* purpose for both
gathering and publishing the information, because otherwise privacy
laws may prohibit companies from gathering or publishing it. Luckily I
think that there are so many such purposes that the need for the
information is indisputable.

Jumping ahead... as I said in a prior call (sorry for missing ones since
then), I would prefer that the information is then allowed for any
purpose, without restriction, because otherwise you have to have not
only tiresome rules about what is allowed but also the Internet Police
to enforce those rules, which seems like a step towards Armageddon.

Given that we're still talking about "thin data", which is basically
just a pointer to a registrar who has *actual* data, my own
recommendation is not to stress too much. This stuff is only very, very
vaguely personally identifiable.

Cheers,

--
Shane

At 2017-01-21 14:51:29 -0500
Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have to disagree.  These are legitimate purposes for collection, as well
> as for disclosure.
>
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 PM, Stephanie Perrin <
> stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
>
> > I filled it out, but I am afraid for most of the purposes I could not
> > agree.  We do not *collect *data for many of those purposes.  We disclose
> > it to people for those purposes, but the purpose of collecting those data
> > elements is not for tax collection, trademark enforcement actions, etc.
> > This is the conflation issue I have raised repeatedly.
> >
> > Apologies if I did not make that point clear enough on the call.
> >
> > Stephanie Perrin
> >
> > On 2017-01-20 17:35, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> >
> > Please note that our current poll ends in about 24 hours.  So far only 16
> > people have responded.
> >
> >
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> > *From:* gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-
> > bounces@icann.org <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Lisa
> > Phifer
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:50 PM
> > *To:* RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Now open: 18 January Poll on
> > Purpose
> >
> >
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > As directed in the 18 January WG call, this week's new Poll on Purpose is
> > now open for WG member participation:
> >
> > https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/SZX9QJZ
> >
> > A PDF of this poll's questions and notes/recordings of the meeting are
> > posted on the 18 January meeting page: https://community.icann.org/x/
> > EbTDAw
> >
> > This poll will close at *COB Saturday 21 January 2017*.
> >
> > All WG members are encouraged to participate in this poll to help advance
> > deliberation and prepare for next week's meeting.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Lisa
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing listgnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> > gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg
> >

 



_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg