Well yes, there is that too J

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/

http://blacknight.blog/

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Social: http://mneylon.social

Some thoughts: http://ceo.hosting/

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: Sam Lanfranco <sam@lanfranco.net>
Date: Monday 30 January 2017 at 13:25
To: Michele Neylon <michele@blacknight.com>, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com>, RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed resolution for raw poll data

I might add that without proper agreement by each individual, to disclosure of past data would put the WG in violation of the law in a number of jurisdictions.
Also, in a move to disclosure, each participant would have to expressly agree (consensus could not be binding on all).
Those who do not agree would probably have to not participate, since macro data and the majority of disclosed results would leave them identifiable.

Sam L.

On 1/30/2017 8:04 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:

Ayden

I have no issue with “raw” or “processed” data being shared BUT only for future polls where people know that the data is going to be shared in that manner.

Doing it retroactively is not a good idea and I would oppose it.

Regards

Michele

   < rest deleted >