On 8 Jun 2016, at 10:37 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> wrote:

Hi All,
Because I had entirely too much time on a flight, I put together a few extra materials:
1. Constitution of California, Massachusetts Right of Privacy, and McINTYRE, v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION (US Supreme Court, 1995)
2. Following Steve's example, a document that provides possible requirements for evaluation alongside existing documents
3. A few Whois Review Team Final Report points to supplement those provided by Susan.

Best,
Kathy
<Constitution of California, Privacy Law of Massachusetts and McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm'n US Sup Court for RDS WG.doc><Kleiman document for RDS WG.doc><Whois Review Team Final Report - a few additional points for RDS WG.doc>_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg