I might add that without proper agreement by each individual, to
disclosure of past data would put the WG in violation of the law in
a number of jurisdictions.
Also, in a move to disclosure, each participant would have to
expressly agree (consensus could not be binding on all).
Those who do not agree would probably have to not participate, since
macro data and the majority of disclosed results would leave them
identifiable.
Sam L.
On 1/30/2017 8:04
AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
Ayden
I
have no issue with “raw” or “processed” data being shared
BUT only for future polls where people know that the data
is going to be shared in that manner.
Doing
it retroactively is not a good idea and I would oppose it.