I'm not quite sure but it might be an attempt to spin the facts of a case (just a filed complaint not a decidion of a court) in order to insinuate an argument that this case is silly thus all trademark rights are silly and thus the rights of trademark owners are silly and thus trademark owners don't deserve access to RDS data.

Or it could just be off-topic.

On Saturday, June 11, 2016, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

Hi,

I'm struggling and failing to understand what this has to do with the
RDS. Can you explain?

Thanks,

A

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:15:39PM -0500, Carlton Samuels wrote:
> ..and Citi sues AT&T for using the word in a commercial! It also owns
> thankyou.com as well!
>
> I checked the USPTO database and it was a revelation; lots of "thankyou"
> there, dead and alive. See:
> http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4803:ku1j42.1.1
>
> So I ask you, who're the halfwits that need to be tarred, feathered and put
> in stock in the village square for a quick kick in the butt from every
> passerby?
>
> http://www.reuters.com/article/us-at-t-citigroup-lawsuit-idUSKCN0YW1K3
>
> -Carlton
>
> [Disclosure: I'm partial to AT&T on account they paid for graduate school.]
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================

> _______________________________________________
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
> gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg

--
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg