HI Chuck,

 

Yes, you replied to all on Tan Sze Ming’s message. Szeming had cc-ed the ntfy list, which rejects all posts by non-staff. However, given the public, open list was also on the list of recipients, the message made it to the list.

 

As a reminder to all: Please use gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org for all your correspondence. The ntfy-gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org list is for staff only to circulate dial in details of WG conference calls to members only, please do not post to that list, it will be rejected, and do not share information circulated on that list.

 

Kind regards

 

Nathalie

 

From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Gomes, Chuck via gnso-rds-pdp-wg" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Reply-To: "cgomes@verisign.com" <cgomes@verisign.com>
Date: Monday, March 13, 2017 at 8:43 AM
To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Test Msg

 

It appears that my response to the test message was rejected.

 

Staff: Con you trouble shoot this?

 

Chuck

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg