GDPR taken to its logical extreme very well could require us to abandon IP reputation and to emptying our firewalls. I mean, no consumer authorized me to process their IP just by attacking me, right?

Privacy absolutism is not the answer unless you basically want to mandate the internet backbone be converted to tor. 

--
John Bambenek

On Feb 16, 2018, at 06:09, Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:

It’s an interesting read, but it has several flaws.

It refers to registrars solely and ignores registries.

It also makes it sound like issues around whois are “new”, which we all know isn’t true.

The comments about IP addresses make it sound like it’s a theoretical concern, yet there is case law eg:

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/european-court-of-justice-rules-ip-addresses-are-personal-data-1.2835704

 

 

 

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/

http://blacknight.blog/

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Personal blog: https://michele.blog/

Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
Date: Friday 16 February 2018 at 00:07
To: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Krebs On Security article RE whois and GDRP

 

Michael Hammer

_______________________________________________
gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list
gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg