You are right Chuck about the WG's role ,

It was just to call our attention so that it can help us set up better requirements or  have a better understanding on security issues associated with the Next Gen-RDS (at the era of IoT.)

Best Regards
@__f_f__
about.me/farell
________________________________.
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.

Le 24 oct. 2016 13:06, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com> a écrit :

Farell,

 

I don’t think that WG has any direct role of preventing such attacks but it is possible that some of the possible requirements we consider could have indirect impacts.  I believe we will need to consider whether and how an RDS could be used to facilitate attacks.

 

Chuck

 

From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Farell Folly
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 5:42 AM
To: RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] [Just for Info] DDoS Attacks against Dyn - Schneier on Security

 

Dear All,

I would like to share this with you. It will question  one more time how the Internet ecosystem  will handle this IoT era and what role we can (this WG)  play to ensure that the best measures / funtionalities /requirement are in place to prevent or reduce  such attacks on the DNS infrastructure. Good reading.

https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2016/10/ddos_attacks_ag.html

Best Regards
@__f_f__
about.me/farell
________________________________.
Mail sent from my mobile phone. Excuse for brievety.