On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenbeck@verisign.com> wrote:
If we decide that an RDDS is needed, we’re going to have to find a way to provide that service using one of the options (WHOIS, WHOIS++, RWHOIS, IRIS, or RDAP) that are already available. RDAP is our best option.

​+1.  

Confession.  My interest in these matters always cleave to the end game. So I have spent a lot of time digging and was lucky enough to be tutored some. [Largely by Scott in an EWG subteam.]​

On the balance of the evidence and given the endgame, I am unanimous that for a functional RDDS with a certain form to it, RDAP and its evolution seems our best bet to address all the known registration data issues and to project a globally-acceptable framework here forward.

-Carlton



==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
=============================