Nathalie, all
Apologies, this call was not in my calendar and as a result I missed it.
Donna
From: gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Nathalie Peregrine
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2016 8:00 AM
To: gnso-review-wg@icann.org
Cc: 'gnso-secs@icann.org' <gnso-secs@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] Mp3 and attendance GNSO Review Working Group 6 October 2016
Dear all,
Please find the MP3 recording for the GNSO Review Working Group held on 6 October 2016 at 12:00 UTC:http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-06oct16-en.mp3
On page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar
Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/
Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ZhmsAw
Attendees:
Members:
Heath Dixon (RrSG Primary)
Sara Bockey (RrSG Alternate)
Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary)
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP)
Lori Schulman (IPC (primary)
Rafik Dammak (NCSG (primary)
Participants:
Advocate Mahendra Limaye
Pascal Bekono
Lawrence Olawale Roberts
Apologies:
none
ICANN staff:
Marika Konings
Julie Hedlund
Lars Hoffman
Larisa Gurnick
Charla Shambley
Berry Cobb
Nathalie Peregrine
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie
-------------------------------
Adobe Connect chat transcript for 6 October 2016
The chat history has been cleared
Nathalie Peregrine: Dear all, welcome to the GNSO Review Working Group call on the 6 October 2016
Nathalie Peregrine: Meeting page:
https://community.icann.org/x/jRa4Aw
Nathalie Peregrine: Rafik Dammak has joined the call
Nathalie Peregrine: Mahendra Limaye has joined the audio bridge
Lori Schulman: I don't have sound at the moment so my apologies. Once again, this deadline looks too ambitious given the WS2 work and deadlines surrounding that.
Heath Dixon: Question: So the dependencies have not already been identified?
Julie Hedlund: @Lori: In the ICANN Board resolultion, the GNSO must submit the implementation plan to the Board by December 2016
Lori Schulman: I will report this back to my constituency but this pushing the same pool of volunteers is beginning to wear on me. I apologize for complaining but this a real
concern.
Julie Hedlund: @Lori: Understood! Volunteer fatigue is a real concern.
Heath Dixon: (I put a question in the chat)
Heath Dixon: (don't have audio)
Heath Dixon: OK. Seems like an important consideration for timing (e.g., if there is a Medium item that is a dependency for a High, then we need to bump it up the queue). What's
the timeframe for staff completing that work?
Julie Hedlund: @Heath: Staff will work to produce an analysis of dependencies as quickly as possible as a first step. It will be helpful if the WG could provide a deadline/goal
for this work. I think we will discuss this today.
Heath Dixon: @Julie: Thank you.
Marika Konings: as far as I am aware, I don't think the GNSO Review recommendations are structure specific (and neither does the transition create a different structure, it just
creates new responsibilities for the GNSO)
Marika Konings: the good thing is that Julie is also the main support for the group that is working on possible changes to the Bylaws and GNSO Operating Procedures as a result
of the post-transition world, so she will in a unique position to recognise any dependencies :-)
Lori Schulman: Agree with Rafik, possibly not a realistic deadline given Hyderabad prep....and all of the time we are spending on Visa applications. :)
Rafik: @lori I was also thinking that most of folks here will celebrate thanksgiving too ;)
Lori Schulman: Yes, we have several days off in US for Thanksgiving.
Rafik: do we have enough members for setting many subgroups?
Julie Hedlund: @Lori and Rafik: But the deadline is 21 November to the Council, so before Thanksgiving :-)
Heath Dixon: Seems like the only way we can succeed.
Lori Schulman: You are killing us.
Heath Dixon: That approach makes sense to me.
Heath Dixon: Question: Do we have an example of a plan at this high level that we can use as a guide?
Lori Schulman: My mid year leadership meeting takes place right after Hyderabad. I will be out commission completely from November 14-19.
Lori Schulman: I have back to back conferences between Hyderabad and the deadline. I will let my constituency know.
Lori Schulman: If Staff is willing to take the first piece of work that would certainly help us meet the tight deadline.
Rafik: lost sounds for some time
Lori Schulman: Glad to see my concerns on the slides....guess that are not new.
Nathalie Peregrine: Lawrence Olawale Roberts has joined the AC room
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: sorry for joining late couldn't get a good connection until now. I'll follow up
Nathalie Peregrine: Pascal Bekono has joined the AC room
Pascal Bekono: Hello dear all, sorry
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: sorry I messed the point
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: ...missed...
Sara Bockey: I think it would depend on the recommendation(s)
Rafik: it depends of the level of effort for each recommendation.
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: I mean I missed what you were saying, Jen.
Lori Schulman: this time works perfectly for me
Lori Schulman: 3 of those 5 weeks I am on travel -- just fyi
Lori Schulman: @Jen = thank you so much for being flexible and understanding this
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: I would like to nominate wolf Ulrich as a co-chair
Nathalie Peregrine: Lawrence you are unmuted
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: sorry my quick didn't work
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: audio
Lori Schulman: Good first meeting Jen. Thank you!
Julie Hedlund: Thanks so much everyone!
Lori Schulman: and to staff for doing the first heavy lift
Wolf-Ulrich Knoben: Thanks all and bye!
Lori Schulman: ciao
Sara Bockey: Thanks all. Thank you staff!!!
Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: thanks and bye