Good idea Marilyn.  Here they are: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/Attendance+Log.  They are maintained on the wiki.  The attendance for today’s call will need to be recorded, but it also is available here: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/2017-11-16+GNSO+Review+WG. Best, Julie From: Marilyn Cade <marilynscade@hotmail.com> Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:54 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, Sara Bockey <sbockey@godaddy.com>, "gnso-review-wg@icann.org" <gnso-review-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] [Ext] Re: Feedback on Timing of GNSO Review Working Group Calls julie, can you post attendance records? that might be helpful to analyze whether time zones are the challenge. From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:51 PM To: Sara Bockey; gnso-review-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] [Ext] Re: Feedback on Timing of GNSO Review Working Group Calls Sara, Thanks for your quick and helpful response! Those are very good points and we’ll take them into consideration. Kind regards, Julie From: Sara Bockey <sbockey@godaddy.com> Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 3:48 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg@icann.org" <gnso-review-wg@icann.org> Cc: Sara Bockey <sbockey@godaddy.com> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-review-wg] Feedback on Timing of GNSO Review Working Group Calls Thanks, Julie. As I mentioned during the call, because AZ doesn’t observe DST, the time didn’t change for me, but it’s an early call nonetheless, 5am. With the time change, the call is now at 4am for the Pacific coast folks. Not sure how many members are west coast, but I can see that being painful. That said, 1200 or 1300 UTC would work for me. I’m not going to complain if I get a sleep in a bit ;-) sara bockey sr. policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey@godaddy.com 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Thursday, November 16, 2017 at 1:38 PM To: "gnso-review-wg@icann.org" <gnso-review-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] Feedback on Timing of GNSO Review Working Group Calls Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, It was noted during the meeting on 15 November that attendance has often been low at WG meetings and not all SGs and Cs have been represented. The WG noted that this could be a consequence of the timing of the meetings being inconvenient. Thus, per this action item from the meeting, “Send email to the WG list about the timing of the meeting and inviting feedback about changing the schedule” staff notes that due to the switch from daylight savings time to standard time, the call on 16 November stayed at 1200 UTC, but this caused the call to fall an hour earlier for some time zones, such as at 0700 EST. We have the option to keep the calls at 1200 UTC, move them to 1300 UTC, or to hold a Doodle poll to find a new day and time for a call. Please provide feedback on these options below at your earliest convenience, but no later than Monday, 27 November to confirm the timing of the call on Thursday, 30 November. You may indicate your preference by placing an “x” mark in front of the preferred option: __X___ Option 1: 1200 UTC on Thursdays bi-weekly __X___ Option 2: 1300 UTC on Thursdays bi-weekly _____ Option 3: Hold a Doodle Poll If we don’t receive enough responses to make a conclusive determination on the timing we’ll use the time of 1200 UTC for the call on 30 November but follow up with a Doodle poll for subsequent meetings. Thank you very much for your assistance. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director