Dear all, Please find the MP3 recording for the GNSO Review Working Group held on 25 October 2016 at 13:00 UTC: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-wg-25oct16-en.mp3 On page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group-2Dactivities_calendar&d=DQMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=xZIJEMTVQJAaGhrSEs-mGNP1af5ZhtLo5tjqyJUr5j4&s=zi8HqkcJPzyRZtbiQ-TlsxBQhcExCdcb-3Ezk1dDjec&e=> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ZhmsAw Attendees: Members: Heath Dixon (RrSG Primary) Sara Bockey (RrSG Alternate) Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary) Donna Austin (RySG Alternate) Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary) Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP) Participants: Pascal Bekono Lawrence Olawale-Roberts Apologies: ICANN staff: Marika Konings Julie Hedlund Lars Hoffman Berry Cobb Terri Agnew ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 25 October 2016 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Review Working Group call on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 at 13:00 UTC Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_M... Rafik:this call is scheduled in the same with the CCWG plenary call Pascal Bekono:Good morning dear all Donna Austin, RySG:Support the nomination of Wolf Ulrich Julie Hedlund:@All: The document is unsynced so you may move through it. Julie Hedlund:@All: Synced again. Marika Konings:For example, on recommendation 8, the work of the Policy & Implementation Working Group already completed a while back so it may just require the WG to confirm that the implementation of those recommendations met the objective of that GNSO review recommendation. Julie Hedlund:@Donna: This timeline is somewhat arbitrary - just a suggestion at this point. Donna Austin, RySG:Thanks Julie, makes sense. Donna Austin, RySG:I can see it Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:I can see it Sara Bockey:I see it Jen Wolfe 2:Got it back now. Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:great Pascal Bekono:Is it possible to have a bacth at the end where we revise all the three priorities ? to analyse dependencies ? Marika Konings:It may be sufficient to point out how this recommendation was implemented through other work that has already completed? Marika Konings:and indeed, in certain cases work may still be underway and should be monitored as such. Terri Agnew:Wolf-Ulrich Knoben has joined on the telephone Berry Cobb:not dialed in. Berry Cobb:I will say, that we have a place holder for "Impact" as part of the Key Performance Indicators dashboard. Berry Cobb:And can use assistance to develop what the analytiical framework should look like. Community input would be most helpful here. Berry Cobb:The DMPM part provided a strawman to assist the community in identifiying metrics that can be used to test policy effectiveness. However, it is at a high level, b/c each PDP is fairly unique and difficult to identify metrics. Agree that it ties into Rec.16 framework action item. Pascal Bekono:Recommandations 10: Can we have in bracket examples of "certain situations" ? Marika Konings:there is an evaluation document that was shared with the Council - we can include it with the information related to this recommendation. I will also check on the status of the development of guidelines. Marika Konings:If I recall well, we had a professional facilitator (external to ICANN) for one F2F WG meeting and one ICANN facilitator (not a member of the WG but very familiar with ICANN and the subject matter) - I believe that the second experience received better reviews than the former. But again, it may very much depend on the specific circumstances of a WG - in certain cases, disagreement evolves around substance while in others it may be the result of process matters. Different experience / expertise may be needed, depending on the circumstances. Pascal Bekono:thanks for this Marika Marika Konings:SG/C reps may know whether this is something that is tracked at a SG/C level and how diversity is defined? Pascal Bekono:I think that we can also add as comment an activity such as Outreach amongst under represented group for selection. Is it fair ? Marika Konings:I think all the current PDP WG have some kind of rotation in place (for example, the RDS PDP rotates 1 out of 3 meetings to an Asia Pacific time), but it still remains a challenge as Donna notes Marika Konings:sorry that should be 1 out of 4 meetings Lawrence Olawale-Roberts: I guess we may propose models that S and constituency's may adopt Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:SG's Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:As what works for 1 may not work for another Terri Agnew:GNSO Review Working Group is scheduled for Tuesday, 15 November 2016 at 14:00 UTC for 60 minutes. Julie Hedlund:Thanks everyone for joining! Donna Austin, RySG:thanks Jen, Julie Sara Bockey:thanks all Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:bye all Pascal Bekono:thanks