Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda
Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNu.... We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
Hello everyone, Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions. Thank you! Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNu.... We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
Please note that I have an internal meeting at 11:30 AM ET today that may cause me to join the Data Sub-team call late. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:02 AM To: gnso-rpm-data@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions. Thank you! Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNu.... We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
I am at the McCarthy Institute today. I will miss this call, but will be on the Co/Chairs call at 11 AM PST Sent from my iPhone On Feb 23, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> wrote: Please note that I have an internal meeting at 11:30 AM ET today that may cause me to join the Data Sub-team call late. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:02 AM To: gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions. Thank you! Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Cjsevans%40adobe.com%7C906e69047c1e4ca1e50408d57acf4dab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636549953146826051&sdata=8hI50Zr%2BKM6XyfIcm69Z4wri5QToBgm1Dm7Rs%2Fctu2Y%3D&reserved=0>. We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-data mailing list Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.or...
I’m also at McCarthy and will miss our call. Apologies. I will have my position statement on the topic of hypos to this group by Monday. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 23, 2018, at 7:10 AM, J. Scott Evans via Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> wrote: I am at the McCarthy Institute today. I will miss this call, but will be on the Co/Chairs call at 11 AM PST Sent from my iPhone On Feb 23, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> wrote: Please note that I have an internal meeting at 11:30 AM ET today that may cause me to join the Data Sub-team call late. Philip S. Corwin Policy Counsel VeriSign, Inc. 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 703-948-4648/Direct 571-342-7489/Cell "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:02 AM To: gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions. Thank you! Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI/edit?usp=sharing<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNutoI%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Cjsevans%40adobe.com%7C906e69047c1e4ca1e50408d57acf4dab%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636549953146826051&sdata=8hI50Zr%2BKM6XyfIcm69Z4wri5QToBgm1Dm7Rs%2Fctu2Y%3D&reserved=0>. We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-data mailing list Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmm.icann.or... _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-data mailing list Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-data
Further to my suggestions online, I attach page 21 from our chart of questions showing the two deletions I would like to make. Michael R. From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Ariel Liang Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:02 PM To: gnso-rpm-data@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions. Thank you! Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org<mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> Date: Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda Hello everyone, Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNu.... We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference. As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful. Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement. The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we: 1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project. Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed. Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion: 1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB Thank you for your time and contributions! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
Tx so much for sending the markup around, Michael. It's great to see it in writing. The edits look good to me! Best, Kathy On 2/23/2018 1:03 PM, Michael Graham (ELCA) wrote:
Further to my suggestions online, I attach page 21 from our chart of questions showing the two deletions I would like to make.
Michael R.
*From:*Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Ariel Liang *Sent:* Thursday, February 22, 2018 9:02 PM *To:* gnso-rpm-data@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda
Hello everyone,
Please note that the Google Doc has been changed to “view only”. Kindly find attached the PDF document that records the redlines/comments made by 05:00 UTC today on the Google Doc. At the time of the meeting, I will revert the Google Doc back to “comment” to facilitate the discussions.
Thank you!
Ariel
*From: *Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org <mailto:ariel.liang@icann.org>> *Date: *Thursday, February 22, 2018 at 11:45 AM *To: *"gnso-rpm-data@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> *Subject: *Google Doc Closes in 12 Hours & Suggested Agenda
Hello everyone,
Kindly note that staff have incorporated Sub Team’s suggestions and comments for Section 5 (brought back the deleted questions on page 34-35 and relocated the introductory text above these questions as a comment): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcNu.... We will close “commenting/suggesting” on the Data Request Google doc at around 05:00 UTC on Friday, 23 February. We will also distribute a PDF document that records the redlines and comments made on the Google Doc for reference.
As a friendly reminder (esp. for Kristine, Susan, and Rebecca), with respect to the hypothetical question on page 35-36, kindly provide your summary of rationale on why such question would be useful or not useful.
Tomorrow’s meeting would be the last one before we forward the updated Data Table to the responding vendors. By EOB tomorrow, the updated Data Table will need to be shared with the full WG and sent to Procurement.
The remaining part of the Data Table is Section 4 (page 28 et seq) and Section 6 (currently blank). We would like to get the Sub Team’s input on this – Should we:
1. Try to tackle the remaining part and develop some agreed suggested questions? 2. Incorporate existing input and comment in Section 4 as is, leave Section 6 blank, and still include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4? 3. Leave Section 4 and Section 6 blank, and include the instruction text previously drafted by Kurt/Rebecca/Kathy for Section 4?
Furthermore, if the Data Sub Team intend to incorporate any survey questions related to the Additional Marketplace RPMs, tomorrow’s meeting is the last opportunity to provide any high-level topics to be incorporated in the Data Table. If we do so, they must be within scope of the survey project.
Last, it would be very useful if the Sub Team could do a quick review of the Data Table from the beginning, making sure everything is in order before it is distributed.
Staff would like to suggest the following agenda for tomorrow’s discussion:
1. Discussion of the remaining part of the Data Table (Section 4, Section 6); whether to include any high-level topics related to Additional Marketplace RPMs 2. Last review/sanity check of the Data Table 3. Timing of future meetings / ICANN61 (whether to repurpose one session for the Data Sub Team) 4. AOB
Thank you for your time and contributions!
Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-data mailing list Gnso-rpm-data@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-data
participants (6)
-
Ariel Liang -
Corwin, Philip -
Dorrain, Kristine -
J. Scott Evans -
Kathy Kleiman -
Michael Graham (ELCA)