Hi Team!

 

Just a mid-week check in to encourage any comments on the rewritten Question 1 that Mary posted.  If we have no comments on the list, we will consider it complete and move on the Question 2 on our next call.  Thanks!

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 

 

Dear Sub Team members,

 

As noted in the Action Items from the Friday Sub Team call (below), please find attached an updated version of the “reverse redline” document with new edits to Question 1, based on the Sub Team’s discussion on the call.

 

In summary, the changes/updates are:

• Rewording of what is now Question 1(a) and 1(b), based on suggestions from Susan Payne, Phil Corwin and Jon Nevett; and
• Additional considerations for Question 1 inserted, to note the need to minimize overlap with other TMCH work being done by the overall Working Group and, where appropriate, distinguish between the TMCH database versus the services of the TMCH validator/provider; and
• Addition of a footnote to clarify that “additional marketplace RPMs” are not the same as TMCH “ancillary services”, and with a note and reference to what “ancillary services” are in the context of the TMCH.

 

We have not otherwise edited the other questions, and therefore those original questions that are marked “proposed for deletion” remain highlighted in grey for further Sub Team discussion.

 

We hope these capture the intent and gist of the Sub Team discussions from last Friday.

 

Thanks and cheers

mary

 

Dear Sub Team Members,

 

Below are the action items from today’s Sub Team call. The action items, notes, documents and recording from today’s call can be found on the meeting’s wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/q3jwAw[community.icann.org]. The call transcripts will be posted on the same wiki page, when they are ready.

 

Thanks.

 

Amr

 

Action Items:

 

1.      Staff to refer the question of scope of the WG regarding Additional Marketplace RPMs to the full Working Group Co-Chairs

2.      Staff to capture current proposed edits to Question 1 by Susan Payne, Jon Nevett and Phil Corwin, and provide a reworded Question 1 to be revised by the Sub Team