Now I see that Ariel yesterday sent us three GDD responses.
Let’s consider what to do with those after today’s call.
Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
703-948-4648/Direct
571-342-7489/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Corwin, Philip via Gnso-rpm-providers
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:55 AM
To: justine.chew@gmail.com
Cc: gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC
Not sure. Can staff advise on what of any responses we have or expect to receive from GDD?
Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190
703-948-4648/Direct
571-342-7489/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: Justine Chew [mailto:justine.chew@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:53 AM
To: Corwin, Philip <pcorwin@verisign.com>
Cc: ariel.liang@icann.org;
gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC
Phil,
May I ask, what might you / we propose as a course of action to deal with any impact the GDD responses might have on the questions to the Providers? Since we didn't have an opportunity to consider those during a sub-team call.
Thanks,
Justine
-----
On 18 April 2018 at 23:33, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin@verisign.com> wrote:
Philip S. Corwin
Policy Counsel
VeriSign, Inc.
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190703-948-4648/Direct
571-342-7489/Cell
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: Gnso-rpm-providers [mailto:gnso-rpm-providers-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Justine Chew
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 11:20 AM
To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-providers@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-rpm-providers] [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC
Just spotted another typo:-
Further Statement
1. Have you acted ...(not Have your acted....)
Thanks,
Justine
-----
On 18 April 2018 at 23:10, Justine Chew <justine.chew@gmail.com> wrote:
Dear Sub-team colleagues, Ariel,
I have spotted a couple of typographical errors which ought to be corrected:-
Under Examiner
6, Do you undertake any independent inquiries to adequately satisfy yourself of your Examiners' impartiality and independence? Or do you rely solely upon the oath or declaration made by each Examiner?
7. (To FORUM and MFSD) Has any of your Examiners voluntarily disclosed any conflict of interest? If not, then what action was taken upon discovery of any conflict? If a conflict was disclosed, did the Examiner do this before and/or during the case proceeding?
Thanks,
Justine
-----
On 18 April 2018 at 00:14, Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org> wrote:
[Message sent on behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs]
Dear WG members:
Please find attached documents generated by the Sub Teams on Practitioners, and on Providers. There is a short description of each document below. These documents will be the presented by the Sub Team Chairs and serve as the main focus of our discussion on tomorrow’s WG call (Wed, 18 April at 17:00-18:30 UTC), with an aim to approving final versions expeditiously so that they can be sent out and responded to as soon as possible.
Providers Sub Team:
1. Consolidated Questions to URS Providers
2. Responses to Propose Questions to URS Providers:
-- The document includes responses already received from Providers during ICANN61 presentation and follow-up emails, as well as responses provided by staff research per Sub Team requests;
-- Questions partially responded by Providers are also included in the document to show why these questions are directed to specific Provider(s)
Practitioners Sub Team: URS Practitioner Background Experience and Perspective
Considerable work has gone into these documents and we thank the Sub Teams for their time, effort and care. As Co-Chairs, we urge that edits be proposed with great care, as balances were carefully considered by the Sub Teams.
A separate URS Documents Sub Team Summary Report being edited by Brian Beckham will be provided shortly. Time-allowing, we will consider this Summary Report tomorrow, otherwise, on 4/25.
Best to all,
Philip & Kathy
From: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Date: Friday, April 13, 2018 at 2:20 PM
To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Proposed agenda for RPM Working Group call on 18 April 2018 at 1700 UTC
Dear RPM PDP WG members,
Here is the proposed agenda for the Working Group call Wednesday, 18 April 2018, scheduled for 1700 UTC:
Proposed Agenda:
- Roll call (via WebEx and phone bridge only); updates to Statements of Interest
- Status reports - with specific recommendations for next steps and timeline - from the three URS Sub Teams (Documents, Practitioners, Providers)
- Discussion/agreement on next steps for the three URS Sub Teams in view of the current Phase One timeline
- Notice of agenda for 25 April meeting
Best regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg