Dear All,

Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 13 February 2019 (18:00-19:00 UTC).  Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2019-02-13+Sub+Team+for+Sunrise+Data+Review.

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

==

NOTES & ACTION ITEMS

Actions:

By Tuesday, 19 February at 18:00 UTC (see previous message for instructions), the Sunrise Sub Team is tasked to:

1. Review the INTA New gTLD Impact Study Survey Result in the ‘Source’ tab of the analysis tool; provide input in the Google Docs set up for ALL Sunrise Charter Questions.
2. Provide further input on the source documents assigned for the previous weeks, if any, in the Google Docs set up for all Sunrise Charter Questions.

Instructions:

• When providing input, please note the source name and page/slide number of the previously collected data.
• By the deadline, the Google Docs will be locked to prevent further editing and their PDFs will be circulated to the Sub Team. Staff will accept and indicate the new input in the Google Doc for the ease of viewing.

Source Documents:

Newly Assigned

1. INTA Survey Final Report by Nielsen (including the original survey questions in the appendix):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/INTA%20Cost%20Impact%20Report%20revised%204-13-17%20v2.1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500376749000&api=v2

2. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the CCT RT (May 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/ICANN%20New%20gTLD%20Survey%20Update%2010May%20Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1501098808000&api=v2

3. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the RPM WG (August 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69277722/INTA%20New%20gTLD%20Cost%20Impact%20Study%20Presentation%20-%2030%20Aug.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1504147055000&api=v2

Previously Assigned

1. Registry Operator Responses to Initial Survey from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Registry%20Responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20-%2013%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

2. Deloitte responses to initial questions from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team:  https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Deloitte%20responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Gathering%20Sub%20Team%20questions%20-%20Jan%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

3. Deloitte TMCH Report: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170311/e28abe0e/ICANNTMCHreport_Feb2017-0001.pdf

4. Response to follow up questions - Apr 2017:  https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170414/4591dc7c/DeloitteResponsestoFollowUpQuestions-0001.pdf

5. Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Analysis%20Group%20Revised%20TMCH%20Report%20-%20March%202017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490349029000&api=v2

6. AG Response to follow up questions - June 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-June/002043.html

7. AG Response to follow up questions - July 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170727/06a0c33e/ResponsesfromAGtoFollowUpQuestions-27July2017-0001.pdf

Google Docs:

• Preamble Sunrise Charter Question: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ph-QXnQLWPVXCDVtM8l51r8Nt0Xojil-CR0fU6cupiU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zi5rDXEkLGMuuRdSgXncOoPVO3vR783yQQ1JYMHqQz0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k8SXcZRSzluqAVkTxYJL63qbBt_A8e9vZNdoKJp8tFc/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10npR7b_6WWJZ6J20583GNq2OLM4jBp-sS-Yeq564GwM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecm9e0jiA6dPsUcACNlHOLgFD5tZPgU3PzF3WtDOdqY/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 5a: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eyuNzBmNDwoZeTd5_y4-WYM7aW3xHdKd0e5QuDAAEck/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 5b: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FMnziYZo0vZdgLVS89wtCQ4Cb5J9tkM_D17r7eCGEMU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15sQKDNohg3Cp6i35U9NKo3r1R_-fxjLHm4D7antNGtA/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cbCKnoIzu5ok3OS5dLi1Kw6dh0-OHa0cjDo1LEv_K9M/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aovilYvgbzf0GXyVN1sBUC2BZCsabnkEvKoQ9SJ4jpM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IvPOFuKMmNdJNyaUmzcnnLsb_-Qmkejn-rvGp3fhsZg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19aBDQ-QFPPYcxwKiR7v5ruojFEYgtggET59N8bHpAXU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sKYwbyUrWYOg2FKzSuZLobdwzi10CZnRgT6SsZrst0k/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
• Sunrise Charter Question 12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jz_VC-96ki-yvLKxIB7ld8IB6wtwSnFnHU1lJlS5aO0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates were provided.

2. Discuss further input on the source documents assigned for previous weeks, if any, in the Google Docs set up for Sunrise Charter Questions 6-12. and begin analysis of the Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services and AG’s responses with respect to the

Claims Charter Questions:

a. Preamble Sunrise Charter Question: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ph-QXnQLWPVXCDVtM8l51r8Nt0Xojil-CR0fU6cupiU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- In as much as the Sunrise portion of the AG it is helpful to look at Appendix I re: statistical validity versus anecdotal -- some of it is anecdotal.

-- Seems that larger TM holders make more Sunrise registrations.

-- Throughout the AG report they make references to the lack of available of data and validity of the conclusions.  Need to be careful in using the AG assumptions/conclusions.

b. Sunrise Charter Question 1: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zi5rDXEkLGMuuRdSgXncOoPVO3vR783yQQ1JYMHqQz0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]  

-- Page 3 -- cost to registars/registries on expanded matches.

-- On not-exact match item -- how much it will affect systems.  Discussed but didn't come to any conclusions.

-- Data seems to suggest that it would be of little benefit to expand.

c. Sunrise Charter Question 2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1k8SXcZRSzluqAVkTxYJL63qbBt_A8e9vZNdoKJp8tFc/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] 

-- Premium pricing is pricing and that is outside of the remit of this WG.

d. Sunrise Charter Question 3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/10npR7b_6WWJZ6J20583GNq2OLM4jBp-sS-Yeq564GwM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- On reserved names -- not a static item; it changes dynamically.  Changes could affect the security and stability of the system.

e. Sunrise Charter Question 4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ecm9e0jiA6dPsUcACNlHOLgFD5tZPgU3PzF3WtDOdqY/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

f. Sunrise Charter Question 5a: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eyuNzBmNDwoZeTd5_y4-WYM7aW3xHdKd0e5QuDAAEck/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Table 12 on page 37 (not 36) -- flag relatively low use of Sunrise period even among TM owners who are aware of the Sunrise.

g. Sunrise Charter Question 5b:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FMnziYZo0vZdgLVS89wtCQ4Cb5J9tkM_D17r7eCGEMU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Summary on page 3, and on 34 and 35 have interesting data.

-- Some disagreement as to whether data support AG's conclusions.

h. Sunrise Charter Question 6: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15sQKDNohg3Cp6i35U9NKo3r1R_-fxjLHm4D7antNGtA/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

i. Sunrise Charter Question 7: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cbCKnoIzu5ok3OS5dLi1Kw6dh0-OHa0cjDo1LEv_K9M/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

3.10 Sunrise Charter Question 8: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aovilYvgbzf0GXyVN1sBUC2BZCsabnkEvKoQ9SJ4jpM/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Marks in Latin scripts -- possible impacts on GeoTLDs, such as .moscow.

3.11Sunrise Charter Question 9: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IvPOFuKMmNdJNyaUmzcnnLsb_-Qmkejn-rvGp3fhsZg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

3.12 Sunrise Charter Question 10: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19aBDQ-QFPPYcxwKiR7v5ruojFEYgtggET59N8bHpAXU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

3.13 Sunrise Charter Question 11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sKYwbyUrWYOg2FKzSuZLobdwzi10CZnRgT6SsZrst0k/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- 97% Latin script on page 7 might be relevant to geo TLDs.

3.14 Sunrise Charter Question 12: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jz_VC-96ki-yvLKxIB7ld8IB6wtwSnFnHU1lJlS5aO0/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]

-- Page 7 of AG report and 97% of Latin script users.