Dear All,

 

Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the RPM Sunrise Sub Team meeting held on 20 February 2019 (18:00-19:00 UTC).  Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2019-02-13+Sub+Team+for+Sunrise+Data+Review.

 

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

 

==

 

NOTES & ACTION ITEMS

 

Actions:

 

By Tuesday, 26 February at 18:00 UTC (see separate email for instructions), the Sunrise Sub Team is tasked to: 

  1. Review the last three sources in the ‘Source’ tab of the analysis tool; provide input in the Google Docs set up for ALL Sunrise Charter Questions. 
  2. Provide further input on the source documents assigned for the previous weeks, if any, in the Google Docs set up for all Sunrise Charter Questions.
  3. Review the additional data submitted and provide your comment on the separate google doc [docs.google.com]

Instructions: 

Source Documents:

Newly Assigned

1. ICANN Staff-Compiled Summary Data on Sunrise Registrations: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20171010/fc173bd9/Staffcompilationreport-Sunrisedata-3Oct2017-0001.pdf

2. ICANN Org-maintained list of Registry Operators and relevant dates for Sunrise, Trademark Claims and other specific approved program periods (e.g. Limited Registration Periods, Qualified Launch Programs): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/program-status/sunrise-claims-periods [newgtlds.icann.org]

3. Data Sub Team Meeting with Jon Nevett (DONUTS) at ICANN61:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79438928/Transcription%20ICANN61%20GNSO%20RPM%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20Meeting%2010%20March%202018.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1521579214000&api=v2

Previously Assigned 

1. Registry Operator Responses to Initial Survey from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Registry%20Responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Sub%20Team%20-%2013%20Dec.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

2. Deloitte responses to initial questions from TMCH Data Gathering Sub Team:  https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Deloitte%20responses%20to%20TMCH%20Data%20Gathering%20Sub%20Team%20questions%20-%20Jan%202017.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1485897782000&api=v2

3. Deloitte TMCH Report: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170311/e28abe0e/ICANNTMCHreport_Feb2017-0001.pdf

4. Response to follow up questions - Apr 2017:  https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170414/4591dc7c/DeloitteResponsestoFollowUpQuestions-0001.pdf

5. Analysis Group Independent Review of TMCH Services: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64066042/Analysis%20Group%20Revised%20TMCH%20Report%20-%20March%202017.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1490349029000&api=v2

6. AG Response to follow up questions - June 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2017-June/002043.html

7. AG Response to follow up questions - July 2017: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20170727/06a0c33e/ResponsesfromAGtoFollowUpQuestions-27July2017-0001.pdf

8. INTA Survey Final Report by Nielsen (including the original survey questions in the appendix):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/INTA%20Cost%20Impact%20Report%20revised%204-13-17%20v2.1.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1500376749000&api=v2

9. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the CCT RT (May 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/61606864/ICANN%20New%20gTLD%20Survey%20Update%2010May%20Final.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1501098808000&api=v2

10. Lori Schulman’s Presentation to the RPM WG (August 2017):https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69277722/INTA%20New%20gTLD%20Cost%20Impact%20Study%20Presentation%20-%2030%20Aug.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1504147055000&api=v2

Google Docs: 

 

Notes:

 

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates were provided.

 

2. Review the INTA New gTLD Impact Study Survey Result with respect to the Claims Charter Questions:

 

-- Overarching comment re: sample size was small and not representative of typical trademark holder (large companies).

 

2.1  Preamble Sunrise Charter Question:

 

-- Additional comments from George Kirikos (to be added).

 

2.6  Sunrise Charter Question 5a:

 

-- Pages 15 and 51 seem relevant.

 

2.8  Sunrise Charter Question 6:

 

-- Slide 52, very indirect (anecdotal).

 

2.11 Sunrise Charter Question 9:

 

-- Michael Karanicolas' comments:  Notes costs associated with suggested changes.

 

2.12 Sunrise Charter Question 10:

 

-- Slide 30, David McAuley's comments and Kathy points out 75% response.  Note also typo -- "profit" should be "proof".