Dear All

Please find below the notes and actions from today’s RPMs TMCH sub-team call.

1. The meeting began with a review of the questions being sent by the Analysis group to the TMCH providers.

An additional question suggested:

What is the "base-line" abandonment rate?

2. A review of the feedback from received from Registrars to the sub-team’s questions took place. The following amendments were suggested:

Q1 stop at "displayed".

Q2 - 4 remove term "cart" and revise to "what is the rate of attempted registration abandonment"

Q Re: TM+50, add general question at the end and remove specific question

The following actions we agreed:

· Staff to share questions with Analysis Group

· Staff to review transcript for proposed revisions to questions to registrars.

· Consider geting TMCH data on their clients registering in new gTLDs (to factor into possibility that a TM owner may be buying their own name, and getting a claims notice - Susan P to check if TMCH clients buying their own name get a notice at all, or if that depends on which registrar they use)

· Add question for Providers re: Compare reg TMCH entries vs. the TMCH +50 designations

· Staff to review registrar questions regarding TM+50 to fold in conclusion of discussions

· ST to provide further suggestions on sunrise questions. Add 'or if you have no data please [insert SB proposed redraft]

Kind regards,

David A. Tait

Policy Specialist (Solicitor qualified in Scotland)

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Mobile: + 44-7864-793776

Email: david.tait@icann.org