I think that give the anticipated complexity and length of our work we should start categorizing the issues being raised so that they are given appropriate attention when those issues are addressed.
Can the Staff please propose a system of categorization so that this can be achieved. I would suggest folders pertaining to issues in which sub folders can be created as needed. This should be accessible to members so that materials can be easily deposited into the correct folder/subnfolder. Each member can then deposit material which can be circulated via link when that particular issues presents itself in the topical agenda.
Of course I am not certain that you have systems to handle such a task and if not then perhaps appointing a particular staff person to organize this material may be appropriate. It should be freely accessible to members via the portal, however.
Dear all,
Please find attached the response from the Registries Stakeholder Group to the letter that had been sent by our Working Group on 28 May to all GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies as well as the other
ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees. As you will recall, our letter sought stakeholder input on our work and methodology.
Staff will discuss how best to ensure that the Registries’ concerns and suggestions for each of the RPMs for which they provided feedback can be considered. We will also post this – and any other responses
received (including the recent note from the RSSAC) – to the WG wiki shortly.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
Mary Wong
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1-603-5744889