Hello fellow WG Members:

What a Team! Fully support leadership. Looking forward to the next meeting.

My apologies for being unable to attend today due to a hearing running long.

 

Best regards,

Scott

 

vlp_logoIntellectualPropertyLaw 100    microbadge[1]

Scott R. Austin | Board Certified Intellectual Property Attorney | VLP Law Group LLP

101 NE Third Avenue, Suite 1500, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Phone: (954) 204-3744 | Fax: (954) 320-0233 | SAustin@VLPLawGroup.com

 

From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marina Lewis
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:08 AM
To: Greg Shatan
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] Joint Message from Three RPM WG Leadership Candidates

 

Fully support this leadership - thanks to all three!

Marina A. Lewis

(415) 290-1245

marina@dns-law.com


On Apr 21, 2016, at 7:28 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:

Support.

 

Greg Shatan

On Wednesday, April 20, 2016, Rudi Vansnick (NPOC) <rudi.vansnick@npoc.org> wrote:

+1 for the three “leaders of the band” 

 

Rudi Vansnick

Chair Non-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)

 

 

Op 19 apr. 2016, om 21:01 heeft Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com> het volgende geschreven:

 

Thank you Phil, Kathy and J. Scott.

 

I fully support this arrangement, knowing that this WG will be led by three dedicated, hardworking, expert, and fair-minded members of our community.  

 

Kind regards,

Paul

 

Paul McGrady

 

From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.orgOn Behalf Of Phil Corwin
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 09:04 AM
To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Joint Message from Three RPM WG Leadership Candidates

 

Dear Members of the Rights Protection Measures Review Working Group:

 

As the three candidates for WG leadership positions who have received substantial support from WG members, we wish to collectively thank all of you for committing to the very challenging and lengthy journey that lies before us, and for voicing support for us as potential WG Chairs.

Each of us believes that our task is extremely important, and that whatever consensus recommendations this WG makes for post-review alterations in the new gTLD RPMs, and subsequently the UDRP, will if adopted likely be the “rules of the road” for ICANN trademark protection measures for many years to come. We have the collective opportunity to establish improved arbitration procedures and other safeguards that are more predictable and consistent for all parties, and that minimize the burden on trademark holders while recognizing the importance of domains as platforms for speech and commerce and as valuable intangible assets.

We also believe that the odds of success will be substantially improved if this WG operates from its inception in a collegial and cooperative manner that, while maximally efficient, is committed to a balanced and fair hearing for all viewpoints, and is based upon empirical data and sound legal and policy analysis.

It was in that spirit of mutual respect that we three engaged in a joint conference call on Friday, April 15th to discuss how to best facilitate a constructive path forward.

As a result of that discussion, we wish to propose for your consideration the adoption of a leadership structure in which each of us serves as a co-equal Co-Chair. We collectively urge you to support that approach to leadership structure when we hold our first WG meeting on April 21st

We believe that in most instances we shall be able to reach consensus agreement regarding recommendations to you on the management of our work. In those (hopefully rare) instances where we fail to reach such agreement, we shall inform the membership of our different viewpoints and proceed in whatever manner garners consensus support.

We are also in general agreement that portions of the task before us can best be facilitated by the creation of focused subgroups that will provide additional leadership opportunities for other members of this WG, with each of the Co-Chairs acting as an Ex Officio member of all subgroups in order to monitor their efforts and assist in coordination with our overall work plan.

If selected as co-equal Co-Chairs, we shall immediately set to develop an initial work plan for your consideration so that we can begin engaging in substantive RPM review by the early part of May. 

It is our collective goal to develop final reports and recommendations that are consistent with the responsibilities established by this WG’s Charter – and that every member of this WG can be proud of having a role in shaping.

Again, we thank you for your support and look forward to joining with you on our initial WG call this coming Thursday.

 

With best regards,

Philip Corwin

J. Scott Evans

Kathy Kleiman

 

 

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/Cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg

 

_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg



This message contains information which may be confidential and legally privileged. Unless you are the addressee, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in the message. If you have received this message in error, please send me an email and delete this message. Any tax advice provided by VLP is for your use only and cannot be used to avoid tax penalties or for promotional or marketing purposes.