Dear WG members, staff and co-chairs,
Since I may not be able to attend the upcoming call this Wednesday, I want to let you know that since last week’s call, I have not become aware of any additional interest in the ‘compromise’ proposal which
I had circulated and which we had discussed on last week’s call (i.e. the one that allowed ‘design marks’ into TMCH but didn’t afford Sunrise priority). Accordingly, I am withdrawing it and continue to support the first proposal, namely the ‘Kleiman / Muscovitch
proposal as revised (see; https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2019-09-11+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG?preview=/117604906/117605391/Kleiman%20Muscovitch%20Proposal%20Compare%20Doc.pdf).
Yours truly,
Zak Muscovitch
ICA General Counsel
From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Date: Saturday, September 14, 2019 at 1:04 AM
To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on 18 September 17:00-18:30 UTC
Dear RPM WG members,
Please find the proposed agenda and materials for the WG meeting on Wednesday, 18 September at 17:00-18:30 UTC.
For ease of reference, here are the actions from the meeting on
11 September:
Actions: WG members should continue consideration and discussion of Open Charter Questions 7 and 8 (see attached documents and discussions
on the list) and review the discussion from the calls on 04 and 11 September via the Zoom chat, recording, and transcript (see the posting on the wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2019-09-11+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG.
Proposed Agenda:
Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Ariel