Dear RPM WG members,

 

Per the actions below from the WG meeting on 25 September the following proposals have been sent to the WG since the last meeting:

 

  Proposal submitted by Martin P Valent for Q2 (1 Oct 2019) 

  Proposal submitted by Greg Shatan for Q7 (1 Oct 2019) (comparison version

  Proposal submitted by Rebecca Tushnet for Q8 (1 Oct 2019) 

  Proposal submitted by Claudio DiGangi for Q8 (1 Oct 2019)

  Proposal submitted by Michael Karanicolas for Q15 (1 Oct 2019)

 

These are collected for your convenient reference on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/TMCH+Proposals.

 

Kind regards,

Mary, Ariel, and Julie

 

From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, October 1, 2019 at 11:00 AM
To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPM Meeting on 02 October at 17:00-18:30 UTC

 

Dear RPM WG members, 

 

This is a reminder.

 

Please find the proposed agenda and materials for the WG meeting on Wednesday, 02 October at 17:00-18:30 UTC.

 

As a reminder, please also see the following action items from the meeting on 25 September:

  

Proposed Agenda:

  1. Review Agenda and Updates to Statements of Interest
  2. Conclude discussion of proposals relating to Open TMCH Charter Questions:
    • Revised Proposal(s) re: Charter Question 7
    • Revised Proposal(s) re: Charter Question 8
  3. Discussion of Deferred Charter Questions (see the attached Status of WG Discussions on Agreed TMCH Charter Questions):
    • TMCH Category 4: Costs & Other Fundamental Features: Charter Questions 12 & 13
    • TMCH Category 5: Access & Accessibility: Charter Question 15
    • TMCH Category 6: Balance: Charter Question 16
    • TMCH Category 1: Education: Charter Questions 1, 2, and 3
    • TMCH Category 2: Verification & Updating of TMCH Database: Charter Questions 4, 5, and 6
  4. Time permitting --Initiate discussion of whether individual URS proposals should be revisited by the WG, and methodology for doing so.
  5. AOB

  

Best Regards,

Mary, Julie, Ariel