Would it materially impact the proposal if we replaced the word "intellectual" with "intangible"?

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 11:03 AM <gmlevine@researchtheworld.com> wrote:
Domain names, valuable or not, are not intellectual property. The referenced Virtual Dates (Forum 2005) decision did not rest on a finding that the new owner was a successor in interest.  GmLevine

-----Original Message-----
From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of George Kirikos
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 10:36 AM
To: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>; Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>
Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Revised Version of URS Proposal #12

[re-sending from my correct email address]

Hi folks,

Attached is the revised version of URS Proposal #12, after discussions with Rebecca on how to handle the unintended consequences she identified in the original proposal. Many thanks to Rebecca for identifying the issue and the solution.

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/


_______________________________________________
GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg