Dear All,

Please see below the action items captured by staff from the RPM PDP Working Group call held on 11 March 2019 at 15:45 UTC at the virtual ICANN67 meeting.  Staff will post these to the wiki space.  Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, Zoom chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2020-03-11+ICANN67+-+Review+of+all+Rights+Protection+Mechanisms+%28RPMs%29+in+all+gTLDs+PDP+WG.

Best Regards,

Julie

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

==

NOTES & ACTION ITEMS

Actions:

1. EPDP Suggested Potential/Preliminary Recommendations: Review the revised text in Recommendation 1 of URS Deliberations [docs.google.com] (pages 1, 2 and new question on page 10)

 Question 1:

ACTION ITEMS:

-- Add specific mention of the EPDP Team for input.

-- Add “(including the GDPR and other applicable privacy laws)”.

-- Cross reference to mention in the report where it is noted that most URS are default cases.

-- Change to “specifically, Recommendations #21, #23, and #27” and add a footnote with the recommendation text.

-- Change “was referred” to “were referred”.

2. Public Comment Tool:

ACTION ITEMS:

-- Add to the introduction: "Please note: that there is an option at the end of this form for those who wish to add text or a point not covered by the questions"  Also note that there is a character limit.

-- Add at the end, “are there any other recommendations that you believe the WG should consider making?”

-- Use all capitals to show emphasis – since boldface is not an option.  But use sparingly.

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates provided.

2. EPDP Suggested Potential/Preliminary Recommendations: Review the revised text in Recommendation 1 of URS Deliberations [docs.google.com] (pages 1, 2 and new question on page 10)

Question 1:

ACTION ITEMS:

-- Add specific mention of the EPDP Team for input.

-- Add “(including the GDPR and other applicable privacy laws)”.

-- Cross reference to mention in the report where it is noted that most URS are default cases.

-- Change to “specifically, Recommendations #21, #23, and #27” and add a footnote with the recommendation text.

-- Change “was referred” to “were referred”.

3. Review of Initial Report Remaining Boilerplate Sections – Action Items from Monday’s meeting) – See the Google docs at: https://community.icann.org/x/1SOJBw

Next Steps: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUr_YS7PbxFDapazk2wtGxPulPsxgL76P45uCsSvSyg/edit [docs.google.com]: Staff will review the Charter to make sure any overarching issues are reflected in the Next Steps document and in the Charter Questions annex.

-- Question: Whether the WG would like to call out the additional questions in the Initial Report for comment?  Answer: WG confirms that they should be included for public comment.

-- No changes from the WG.

4. Public Comment Tool: Address any questions/clarify possible areas of confusion. See: https://forms.gle/FjAarKNu2HGzdKo8A [forms.gle] [forms.gle]

-- Standard form for public comments.

-- Ensures that the categorization of the comments is more accurate.  Staff don’t have to make assumptions concerning support/non-support.

-- Enables commenters to use a free-form box to provide general comments.

-- Commenters can access both a Word and PDF version as a working document, although commenters will need to submit comments using the tool.

ACTION ITEMS:

-- Add to the introduction: "Please note: that there is an option at the end of this form for those who wish to add text or a point not covered by the questions"  Also note that there is a character limit.

-- Add at the end, “are there any other recommendations that you believe the WG should consider making?”

-- Use all capitals to show emphasis – since boldface is not an option.  But use sparingly.