Julie:

I am reluctant to dive back in with any more changes, but several items I believe are worth mentioning on the redline I received today.

1. The centered “title” of the document is really a heading intended for the first set of questions (which has no heading) and should be moved down to the left margin as an initial heading above the first question at a left justified location similar to the un numbered headings which follow (perhaps an A, B, C, outline format would be useful, but its in PDF so can’t insert.)
2. There are footnote texts at the bottom of pages 5 and 6 but I could not find the superscript notes to which they relate.
3. Does the document have a title or do these questions just appear after the introductory remarks and caveat we created previously? Perhaps we should see the entire document in final.

 

 

 

 

Dear all,

 

Further to the message below, this is a reminder to send in any comments or suggested edits not later than today, Tuesday, 24 April.  Any further suggestions will be considered along with those received thus far from Brian Beckham and George Kirikos.

 

Best Regards,

Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel

 

Dear All,

 

Please see the attached revised document “URS Practitioner Background Experience and Perspective” based on the comments and suggestions received during the RPM PDP WG meeting today, 18 April.  Please review the document per the following action item highlighted below.  The suggested edits are indicated by redline and strikethrough in the attached document.

 

1. Questions for URS Practitioners:
   1. Staff will provide to the WG a redlined document with suggested revisions by 18 April (DONE-Attached)
   2. WG members are encouraged to provide any further comments/suggestions by COB Friday, 20 April, but not later than Tuesday, 24 April;
   3. Staff will provide to the WG a final redlined document before the meeting on Wednesday, 25 April.

 

Please note:

• When the proposed questions are finalized, staff will proofread and correct typos, formatting errors, etc. before the questions are converted into a survey; WG members are encouraged to focus your comments/suggestions on the substance.
• Only the PDF version is provided to ensure the WG is commenting/suggesting edits to the content in one master document, so as to avoid any potential version confusion caused by Word file(s).

 

Thank you for your time and review!

 

Best Regards,

Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel