Dear RPM PDP Working Group members,

On behalf of the Co-Chairs, please see the draft agenda below for the Working Group meeting on Wednesday, 26 September at 1200 UTC (NOTE ROTATING TIME) for 120 minutes.

Per Co-Chairs’ Proposed Procedure, for this next meeting, the Working Group will continue discussion of the Individual URS Proposals.  According to the timeline published on the wiki and as described in the message below, the order of the presentation is as follows.  WG members are requested to review the presentations prior to Wednesday’s meeting.  Staff would like to provide you a heads-up that the order of presentations tomorrow would be slightly adjusted as follows:

1. Brian Winterfeldt’s team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-10.pdf?api=v2
2. Brian Winterfeldt’s team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-11.pdf?api=v2
3. George Kirikos: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-24.pdf?api=v2
4. Zak Muscovitch: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-25.pdf?api=v2
5. Brian Winterfeldt’s team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-15.pdf?api=v2
6. Brian Winterfeldt’s team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-16.pdf?api=v2
7. Brian Winterfeldt’s team: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/93126760/URS-Proposal-22.pdf?api=v2

Per the procedure, please also note the following time requirements for the presentations:

• When a proposal is up for discussion, its proponent will be accorded a maximum of five (5) minutes to orally present the proposal, rationale, and supporting evidence.
• The floor will then be open to other Working Group members to comment on the proposal for a maximum of two (2) minutes each, with total discussion limited to twenty (20) minutes. However, if there is exceptionally high interest in a topic, the Co-Chairs would have discretion to increase the discussion time.
• At the end of twenty (20) minutes, or when there are no more commenters in queue, the proponent will have up to four (4) minutes to respond and/or propose a modification of the proposal based upon the discussion.

Depending on the actual progress during the Wednesday meeting, if a proposal cannot be presented due to time limitation, the presentation should be deferred to a future meeting.

Draft Agenda:

1. Review Agenda/Statements of Interest Updates
2. Discussion of Individual URS Proposals (See: wiki)
3. AOB

Best,

Mary, Ariel, Berry, and Julie

On Behalf of the RPM PDP WG Co-Chairs