Dear members of the RPM PDP WG:

Yesterday I presented a proposal to this WG in my personal capacity that addressed the timing and number of examinations in those cases where a URS respondent ‘defaulted.’

Thanks again to the co-chairs for a well-designed process for submitting/weighing these proposals, and to staff for implementing the process so efficiently.

Some asked during this presentation if I would be willing to tweak/adjust the proposal to better suit a request for public comment in light of the comments, both pro and con, being made as I spoke.

My answer would be yes. However, prior to looking over the record and taking such steps I want to note to the WG that it seems advisable to wait until a similar proposal is aired, proposal #15 from Brain Winterfeldt et al.   It appears to be first up in the next teleconference.

By considering these together, the co-chairs may have a better insight into whether they should be considered separately or combined.

Best regards,

David

David McAuley

Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager

Verisign Inc.

703-948-4154