Phil,

The first question concerns their respective Provider Rules, such as their online filing systems and the submission of evidence.

The second is a question of general applicability.

Best regards,
Claudio



On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Corwin, Philip <pcorwin@verisign.com> wrote:

Claudio—which section of the presentation does this relate to? Or is it miscellaneous?

 

Philip S. Corwin

Policy Counsel

VeriSign, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

703-948-4648/Direct

571-342-7489/Cell

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of claudio di gangi
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 9:44 AM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>; ICANN61-103A@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [gnso-rpm-wg] RPM March 15 session - questions

 

Mary,

 

I dialed-in a little late, so apologizes if these have already been asked. 

 

My questions are the following:

 

1. If a domain is used to further a phishing attack, do their online filing systems accept evidence of email abuse, such as the email header? 

 

2. If the WG were to recommend the URS apply to legacy gTLDs (as a consensus policy), can the providers easily scale their services accordingly or would they anticipate challenges doing so?

 

Thanks!

 

Best regards,

Claudio