Thanks Ariel,
For the document:
Consolidated questions to URS Providers, at Communications Q4 where it says “has been either deleted or purged” should this be reworded to capture the expiry/expiration concept?
There are a number of questions that providers may not know, as they are really asking about things an examiner is looking at, namely at The Complaint Q4, The Response Qs 1
and 14, and Default Q3.
In the same spirit, also note that at The Response Q4, the Rules cited vests discretion for a time extension with a provider, but the question asks what examiners consider
exceptional circumstances.
(Please note that for Examiner Determination Q3, URS Rules para 13(a) specifically provides that an examiner may “make a Determination …in accordance with …any rules and principles
of law that it deems applicable.”)
Kind regards,
Brian
From: gnso-rpm-wg [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Ariel Liang
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2018 9:58 PM
To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Consolidated Questions to URS Providers - Please Comment by Friday, 20 April
Dear All,
Staff are recirculating the two documents developed by the Providers Sub Team:
Please be so kind to provide your comments/suggestions to the “consolidated questions” document directly on the mailing list by
COB Friday, 20 April.
Kindly note:
Thank you for your time and review!
Best Regards,
Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel
|
Powering change: Women in innovation and creativity World Intellectual Property Day 2018 April 26 wipo.int/ipday #worldipday |
World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected
information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.