Ill bite here.  

Answer:  0 (zero).  Sunrise is not fit for its original purpose.  Few legitimate trademarks are being submitted.  There is evidence of abuse in sunrise registrations.  More importantly, the notice process seems more than sufficient to address the legitimate concerns.

Sent from my iPad

On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:25, claudio di gangi <ipcdigangi@gmail.com> wrote:

George,

I'm going to use an extreme example to illustrate my point.

If 1,000,000 new gTLDs are launched in the next round, how many Sunrise registrations do think there should be order to reach the "success" threshold?

Best,
Claudio

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:50 PM George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi again,

On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:44 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
>with stats propped up with high counts of sub-$1
> registrations, or even domains that are stuffed into the accounts of
> registrants of other TLDs (e.g. .xxx with NSI, or .kiwi).

Sorry, that was a typo. It should have been .XYZ with NSI, of course,
not .XXX, e.g.

http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140605.htm

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg