+1
Brian J. Winterfeldt
Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
Mayer Brown LLP
202.263.3284 direct dial
202.830.0330 fax
212.506.2345 direct dial
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of J. Scott Evans via gnso-rpm-wg
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 1:40 PM
To: Paul Keating; Marie Pattullo
Cc: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org; Michael Karanicolas
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services
Importance: High
Paul:
I think the proponents of the closed database have repeatedly articulated the benefits they see in a closed database. That is the status quo. In order to change the status
quo, it is the proponents for an open system that need to articulate (persuasively) an overriding need or benefit for such a change.
J. Scott
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
From:
<gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Paul Keating <paul@law.es>
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 12:21 PM
To: Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be>
Cc: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>, Michael Karanicolas <michael@law-democracy.org>
Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR INFORMATION: Letter from trademark scholars and information on Deloitte Ancillary Services
Question.
solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
mitigated by having the database be closed
Can someone please list the issues and concerns at issue here?
And, how has closing the database mitigated any of them?
Sent from my iPad
On 28 Mar 2017, at 21:07, Marie Pattullo <marie.pattullo@aim.be> wrote:
solutions for the issues and concerns that have been
mitigated by having the database be closed