George, all,
Personally, I don't believe WIPO is doing anything wrong by not publishing your specific list of post-UDRP cases, which is not a requirement for Providers. From my perspective, it looks like they have posted some of these cases as a nice gesture to the community.
The webpage on which these cases are published clearly states these are "select" cases and there is no intent to create a comprehensive, updated running list of all post-UDPR actions.
Moreover, in taking a quick glance at some of the cases you highlighted:
<Soundstop.com> - the court case settled; it doesn't appear the court issued a holding that is generally applicable to other UDRP proceedings.
<
sdt.com> - it looks like the UDRP panel terminated the proceeding to let the court case run its course.
<Moobitalk.com> - the decision of the appeals court was based on a legal principle (territoriality) that is not a required element under the UDRP. This seems to be a relatively unique case and publishing this decision may confuse some readers in terms of the general applicability of UDRP jurisprudence.
---
In terms of Brian's nomination, I am very grateful that he is willing to serve and dedicate the time needed to take on this role. As mentioned by Zak and other's, I believe he is preeminently qualified and has the natural leadership skills that will greatly benefit our team.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Claudio