Dear all,

 

Please find attached an updated version of the Trademark Claims document that was discussed on the Wednesday call. In addition to the new substantive edits that were made, based on the Action Items numbered 1, 2 and 3 from Amr’s notes (below), you will see the following changes:

 

 

 

 

We hope you find the updates useful. Please review the updated document – as well as the updated document for Sunrise (circulated on Friday 14 July) – and provide your comments to this email list for further discussion. In the meantime, staff will continue to work with the co-chairs to develop a proposal for handling the various data collection requests, and update the Open TMCH Questions poll in accordance with the last Action Item (#4) from the Wednesday call.


Thanks and cheers

Mary

 

From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 13:35
To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items for GNSO Review of all RPMs for all gTLDS PDP WG Call - 19 July 2017

 

Dear Working Group Members,

 

Below you will find the action items from yesterday’s WG call. The action items, notes, recordings, transcripts and meeting documents have all been posted on the meeting’s wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/c3vwAw[community.icann.org]

 

Thanks.

 

Amr

 

 

Action Items:

 

  1. Staff to replace threshold question of Question 4 of Trademark Claims with: Is the exact match requirement on Trademark Claims serving the intended purposes of the Trademark Claims RPM?
  2. Staff to updated Question 4 of Trademark Claims with the proposed question addressing IDN issues, and include additional examples provided by Amadeu Abril during WG face-to-face meeting in ICANN 59
  3. Staff to propose a rewording of question 6 of Trademark Claims, and suggest where to place it – as a sub-question in question 2 or 3
  4. Staff to provide a breakdown of responses for each question in the poll by stakeholder group, as responders identified themselves in the responses to Question 2 of the poll