FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH
Dear all, We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-e..., as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2.... In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg. Thanks and cheers Mary
Thanks for this Mary. Could you circulate the agenda for this week, assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call. Susan Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd 28-30 Little Russell Street London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom E: susan.payne@valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH Dear all, We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-e..., as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2.... In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg. Thanks and cheers Mary
+1 Susan. All, we need the agenda well in advance of the calls in order to prepare for meaningful participation. Do we have a time certain every week when we should expect them? I would think we need 48 hours minimum… Best, Paul From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:46 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH Thanks for this Mary. Could you circulate the agenda for this week, assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call. Susan Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd 28-30 Little Russell Street London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom E: <mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> susan.payne@valideus.com D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH Dear all, We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-e..., as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2.... In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg. Thanks and cheers Mary
+1 From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Paul McGrady Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 2:52 PM To: 'Susan Payne' <susan.payne@valideus.com>; 'Mary Wong' <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH +1 Susan. All, we need the agenda well in advance of the calls in order to prepare for meaningful participation. Do we have a time certain every week when we should expect them? I would think we need 48 hours minimum… Best, Paul From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:46 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH Thanks for this Mary. Could you circulate the agenda for this week, assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call. Susan Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd 28-30 Little Russell Street London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom E: susan.payne@valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH Dear all, We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-e..., as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2.... In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg. Thanks and cheers Mary
This issue was brought up last year: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000292.html "Call are more productive when we have ample time to prepare for and ponder the agenda." http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000293.html "....and we are working on ways to distribute it earlier in the future." Organizationally and from a time management point of view, it might make sense for the co-chairs and ICANN staff to "linger" at the conclusion of the weekly calls for say an additional 10 minutes, after everyone else has left, to plot the agenda for the following week's call, while everything's fresh in their minds and everyone involved in setting the agenda is likely present Then, WG members would likely receive the agenda 5 to 7 days in advance of the next meeting. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
+1 Susan.
All, we need the agenda well in advance of the calls in order to prepare for meaningful participation. Do we have a time certain every week when we should expect them? I would think we need 48 hours minimum…
Best,
Paul
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:46 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH
Thanks for this Mary. Could you circulate the agenda for this week, assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call.
Susan
Susan Payne
Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
28-30 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom
E: susan.payne@valideus.com
D: +44 20 7421 8255
T: +44 20 7421 8299
M: +44 7971 661175
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH
Dear all,
We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22feb17-e..., as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2....
In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
+1 -- George's "linger" suggestion has the benefit of ensuring that agenda maintains WG's focus. Michael R. -----Original Message----- From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of George Kirikos Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 3:24 PM To: gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH This issue was brought up last year: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000292.html "Call are more productive when we have ample time to prepare for and ponder the agenda." http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/2016-June/000293.html "....and we are working on ways to distribute it earlier in the future." Organizationally and from a time management point of view, it might make sense for the co-chairs and ICANN staff to "linger" at the conclusion of the weekly calls for say an additional 10 minutes, after everyone else has left, to plot the agenda for the following week's call, while everything's fresh in their minds and everyone involved in setting the agenda is likely present Then, WG members would likely receive the agenda 5 to 7 days in advance of the next meeting. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 5:52 PM, Paul McGrady <policy@paulmcgrady.com> wrote:
+1 Susan.
All, we need the agenda well in advance of the calls in order to prepare for meaningful participation. Do we have a time certain every week when we should expect them? I would think we need 48 hours minimum…
Best,
Paul
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Susan Payne Sent: Monday, April 03, 2017 4:46 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH
Thanks for this Mary. Could you circulate the agenda for this week, assuming the discussion with AG is not the whole call.
Susan
Susan Payne
Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd
28-30 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom
E: susan.payne@valideus.com
D: +44 20 7421 8255
T: +44 20 7421 8299
M: +44 7971 661175
From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 03 April 2017 17:22 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] FOR REVIEW THIS WEEK: Analysis Group Revised Report on the TMCH
Dear all,
We are pleased to let you know that Greg Rafert of the Analysis Group will be joining our Working Group for part of our call this coming Wednesday (5 April, 1700 UTC). This note is therefore being sent to request that members review the Analysis Group’s Revised Report on the TMCH in time for our Wednesday session. We’d previously circulated the revised report; however, for your convenient reference here is the link to the clean version: https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-22f eb17-en.pdf, as well as the redlined version (showing changes from the Draft Report that had been published for public comment, and that had been reviewed by our Working Group’s Data Gathering Sub Team): https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/reviews/tmch/revised-services-review-redline-2....
In the meantime, if you have questions or comments based on your review of the report, please feel free to post them to this list and staff can forward them to Greg.
Thanks and cheers
Mary
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
participants (5)
-
George Kirikos -
Mary Wong -
Michael Graham (ELCA) -
Paul McGrady -
Susan Payne