GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI
Hi folks, (resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly) I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950 (92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too. As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP. Best regards, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Dear all Working Group Colleagues, I look forward to work with you and the ICANN staff on this very important and interesting topic. The RPMsare all systems created to ensure that trademark owners have available the tools necessary to stop infringements and misuse in the form of registered and used domain names. This is important not only for the trademark owners, but also for the general customer to ensure that they can trust the online information. I have worked with the RPMs since the UDRP started, both as panelist and attorney, and hope that my experience – also from a European point of view – can be of any use in this WG. My updated SOI is here: <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Petter+Rindforth+SOI> All the best, Petter -- Petter Rindforth, LL M Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you 25 mars 2016 18:01:42 +01:00, skrev Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>:
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs!
Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines.
In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings.
Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: <https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.>
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: <mary.wong@icann.org> Telephone: +1-603-5744889
On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <<gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950>
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 <http://www.leap.com/>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <<icann@leap.com>> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI>
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 <http://www.leap.com/> _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg>
Hello All, Pleasure to meet all of you. My name is Roger Doumanian, I am an attorney that works with many domain owners, with an emphasis on Domain Dispute Resolution matters. In addition to Domain Dispute Resolution, I provide Intellectual Property law services, including trademarks. I have represented various clients on both sides of the issue in Domain Name Dispute matters, so I hope to bring a lot of value to the table when it comes to intellectual property rights and domain ownership. I am also the CEO and Founder of several technology firms, including a digital marketing agency that has a domain name reseller division. We deal will thousands of clients around the world, providing them with digital marketing, web development, and domain name services. You can learn more about me by visiting the link below to see my SOI. I look forward to working alongside so many professionals in the industry and the amazing team members at ICANN. https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Roger+Doumanian+SOI Have a blessed weekend! Best Regards, *Roger H. Doumanian*, Attorney at Law 25251 Avenue Tibbitts Valencia, CA 91355 *Phone* (661) 481-3091 *Fax* (661) 295-3336 www.rogerdoumanian.com *CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION * Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Petter Rindforth via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all Working Group Colleagues,
I look forward to work with you and the ICANN staff on this very important and interesting topic.
The RPMs are all systems created to ensure that trademark owners have available the tools necessary to stop infringements and misuse in the form of registered and used domain names. This is important not only for the trademark owners, but also for the general customer to ensure that they can trust the online information. I have worked with the RPMs since the UDRP started, both as panelist and attorney, and hope that my experience – also from a European point of view – can be of any use in this WG.
My updated SOI is here:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Petter+Rindforth+SOI
All the best,
Petter
-- Petter Rindforth, LL M
Fenix Legal KB Stureplan 4c, 4tr 114 35 Stockholm Sweden Fax: +46(0)8-4631010 Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360 E-mail: petter.rindforth@fenixlegal.eu www.fenixlegal.eu
NOTICE This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read, copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail. Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, www.fenixlegal.eu Thank you
25 mars 2016 18:01:42 +01:00, skrev Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>:
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs!
Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines.
In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings.
Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889
On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Dear Colleagues, As a long-time UDRP party representative (300+ cases), speaker, and blog author I have a strong interest in bringing a balanced and objective view to the WG. I feel that the RPMs, and in particularly the UDRP, can be made more effective. However, any proposed changes must result in such RPMs remaining true to their original purpose of being viable alternatives to expensive court litigation. In order to do this, they must be viewed as fair by all involved parties. I¹m eager to help enhance this perception of the RPMs and look forward to working with the group. Regards, Steve Steven M. Levy, Esq. Philadelphia, PA United States Phone: +1-215-327-9094 Email: slevy@AccentLawGroup.com Blog: http://blog.fairwindspartners.com/udrp-and-urs LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/stevelevy43a/ On 3/25/16, 1:01 PM, "Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that¹s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs!
Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO¹s Working Group Guidelines.
In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George¹s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others¹ (and your own) information and postings.
Finally, if you haven¹t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889
On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Dear Colleagues: I work on policy development and implementation at Endurance International, which operates a variety of domain name registrars and hosting companies. I’m currently the Secretary of the Registrar Stakeholder Group and have participated in other policy efforts in the ICANN community. The RPMs are an important aspect of the continued advancement of the domain name industry. It’s important that we respect the rights of all and ensure that policies relating to RPMs are operationally viable and meet the global needs of the community. I’m excited to work with all of you on this PDP. My SOI is at https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Darcy+Southwell+SOI. Have a wonderful weekend! Darcy __________ Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Reply-To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Thanks, Mary - and hello everyone! I am a trademark/copyright attorney from the San Francisco Bay Area, and currently Senior Counsel with Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP. I am also the current American Bar Association representative to the IPC. I have counseled clients on domain name disputes and RPM's since 2007. My goal is to promote a balanced and reasoned approach to the DNS, one that respects the legitimate rights of brand owners and domain name registrants alike, with a particular focus on the welfare and safety of Internet users and the consuming public. I look forward to working with each of you. Kind regards, Marina Marina A. Lewis marina@dns-law.com<mailto:marina@dns-law.com> (510) 541-1906 On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950 (92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too. As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP. Best regards, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com<mailto:icann@leap.com>> wrote: Hi folks, (resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly) I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Dear all: I am an intellectual property attorney and partner in a large international law firm (Mayer Brown LLP), and generally divide my time between our New York and Washington DC offices. My practice primarily focuses on domestic and international trademark law, Internet governance, and domain name matters including both brand protection and advising new gTLD registry operators (including of both .Brand and open generic new gTLDs). Our firm is an authorized Trademark Clearinghouse agent, and we frequently represent clients in a range of industries on internet related matters, including domain name disputes, such as the UDRP and various ccTLD domain dispute processes. I am a member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), for which I recently concluded a four year term as a GNSO Councilor, and have previously served as the IPC Treasurer. I currently also serve on the Board of Directors of the International Trademark Association (INTA), am a member of the project team for the 2016 INTA Annual Meeting, serve as special advisor for INTA's Internet Committee and previously served four years as co-chair of INTA's Trademark Administrators Committee Internet Project Team. I have authored and co-authored numerous articles in the fields of trademark law, domain name issues, and Internet governance, and speak frequently on these issues. My full professional biography can be found here<https://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Brian-Winterfeldt/>, and my ICANN Statement of Interest can be found here<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>. I very much look forward to working with you all in the context of this Working Group. Best regards, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice Mayer Brown LLP bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com<mailto:bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com> 1999 K Street, NW<x-apple-data-detectors://2/2> Washington, DC 20006-1101<x-apple-data-detectors://2/2> 202.263.3284<tel:202.263.3284> direct dial 202.830.0330<tel:202.830.0330> fax 1221 Avenue of the Americas<x-apple-data-detectors://3/0> New York, New York 10020-1001<x-apple-data-detectors://3/0> 212.506.2345<tel:212.506.2345> direct dial On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that's been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO's Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George's lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others' (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven't already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950 (92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too. As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP. Best regards, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com<mailto:icann@leap.com>> wrote: Hi folks, (resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly) I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg __________________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
Hi Brian & RPM WG: Cc ADR Forum: Brain, having now indulged you're love of art, dining and world travel, on the fees ICANN derives from the lowly .COM Domain Name Registrants, to go globetrotting, perhaps you'll tell the Domain Name Registrants participating in this forum why under You're direction & management, You'd have Steptoe LLP inform a Virginia Court that CentralNic's portfolio of FAKE cc.COMs are: extraterritorial to the Lanham Act? Why too would you simultaneously inform the Court that Network Solutions aren't violating their Contract to / with Domain Name Registrants, when they re-sell { Infringe ~ Dilute & Blur .COM with uk.com ~ eu.COM etc } with their own retail client ~ CentralNic's uk.COM Domain Name. Informed as I well know you to be, how is the conduct of both you're clients, not Contributory Infringement, Dilution & Blurring; and also Racketeering? Perhaps in you're capacity as IPC / TM.com Defendant, here in this group { which you should resign from } to be an active Ry/rSG participant ~ explain why Francis Gurry opted to discharge CentralNic as a client, not so very long ago? The 2nd Part of the question to you, also asks of / includes the "Individual" from the ADR Forum this: Why I, as a Domain Name Registrant must "mediate" with another Domain Name Registrant, who's entire business practice is that of "Inducing" Infringement via SUB.COM Domain's? The ADR Forum should know that when CentralNic "registered" uk.COM with NSI, TLD Registrar Solutions & Demys that their obliged to the same ICANN .COM / RAA rules as all others! Specifically, 3.7.7.9. Is the ADR Forum unaware that being the: solution or remedy to a problem created by the person who contracts them, CentralNic, in the fist degree ~ to solve the problem they created, becoming apparent to the Complainant, through the 2nd Degree, not then actively engaging in Racketeering? To all the other participants in this RPM-WG, I presume / reasonably expect, that you'd all know the .COM is subject to VaED Laws. Given that New Zealander & ICANN'er Mr. Kumar cautions NZ Citizens {and others too} to be aware of their exposure to USA Law, via .COM use.
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/have-com-web-address-know-legal-risks-ck-113355 I'd encourage all the American Attorneys in the group to read SCOTUS 14-1480's "Questions Presented" because above all others, it's You're American Law & American Consumers being "dotCONNED". Stop being scammed by CentralNic; and stop letting them e~VaED proper USA law. Unless, being the clever con-artists CentralNic are, the've got You Americans charmed, so much so, that the USA has surrender sovereignty to ... The British Empire?! SCOTUS 14-1480. https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdf2jYq... In closing, lets remember that under US Common Law, our Marks, Trade Names & Trade Marks are protected in Cyberspace ~ 1st in Use ~ and also that the "NEW gTLDs" are a contracted dimension in Cyberspace, from the NTIA, for ICANN to build and manage in the DNS. Therefore .... the Trademark Clearing House is also an ICANN racket, as our .COMs = Madrid System equivalent Marks, Trade Names & Trademarks in Cyberspace = In Use, in / with .COM, which mean the default "clearing house" should be the .COM availability list. Regards to all. Graham Schreiber. 416.803.4678. <><><><><><><> [comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13] ------------------------------ <<< Chronological Index <https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/index.h...>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...> Thread Index <https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/threads...>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...>
ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ?? - *To*: comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13@xxxxxxxxx - *Subject*: ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ?? - *From*: Graham Schreiber <graham_schreiber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - *Date*: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:56:33 -0400 ------------------------------ Hello ICANN: cc: NTIA, DoC, Jones Day, WIPO, Garth Bruen & Senator Leahy. [[ 4CCA & VAED - for good measure! ]] ICANN, c/o Jones Day: In accordance with your Clients affirmation: "Whereas, ICANN is committed to operating in an open and transparent manner" and my Civil Lawsuit # 13-1812, against your client, for failing to enforce the RAA Sections 3.7.7.3 an 3.7.7.9 ~ I wish to have you oblige my request by furnishing the "agreement(s) between CentralNic and ICANN ..." that WIPO is talking about, just below. For the thoughtful consideration of parties outside ICANN, I'd like to illustrate that other Companies have been "victimized" by CentralNic's "Contributory Infringement" and False Designation ccTLDs, which beyond flaccid ICANN Rules, are directly violating a United States Law # 15 USC § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden, Those four (4) gigantic firms, who've been "fleeced" by WIPO for what amounts to a "Racket" system, accepted by ICANN, to protect CentralNic are: WIPO D2009-1741 Coke-a-Cola WIPO D2013-0746 National Car Rental WIPO D2011-1416 Oakley Glasses WIPO D2012-0249 Zippo
From Wikipedia: A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, will not be affected, or would not otherwise exist. Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime)
As a USPTO "Registered" Trademark Holder, I fully anticipate my "Day in Court" to be granted [ Details at 4CCA Case # 13-1812 ] so that I may bring this injustice; and chronic harming too USPTO Brands to an end. Further; and most critically, as catalyst to this information being made public, it will help the United States Department of Justice, prevent further "harm to American consumers" from occurring, which is their sole purpose. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Graham Schreiber, Pro Se. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian J. via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all:
I am an intellectual property attorney and partner in a large international law firm (Mayer Brown LLP), and generally divide my time between our New York and Washington DC offices. My practice primarily focuses on domestic and international trademark law, Internet governance, and domain name matters including both brand protection and advising new gTLD registry operators (including of both .Brand and open generic new gTLDs). Our firm is an authorized Trademark Clearinghouse agent, and we frequently represent clients in a range of industries on internet related matters, including domain name disputes, such as the UDRP and various ccTLD domain dispute processes.
I am a member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), for which I recently concluded a four year term as a GNSO Councilor, and have previously served as the IPC Treasurer. I currently also serve on the Board of Directors of the International Trademark Association (INTA), am a member of the project team for the 2016 INTA Annual Meeting, serve as special advisor for INTA’s Internet Committee and previously served four years as co-chair of INTA’s Trademark Administrators Committee Internet Project Team.
I have authored and co-authored numerous articles in the fields of trademark law, domain name issues, and Internet governance, and speak frequently on these issues.
My full professional biography can be found here <https://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Brian-Winterfeldt/>, and my ICANN Statement of Interest can be found here <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>.
I very much look forward to working with you all in the context of this Working Group.
Best regards,
Brian
*Brian J. Winterfeldt*
Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
Mayer Brown LLP
bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com
1999 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1101
202.263.3284 direct dial
202.830.0330 fax
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020-1001
212.506.2345 direct dial
On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs!
Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines.
In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings.
Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889
On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that
this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and
some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take
a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group
participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a
very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now
appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this
working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that >
the interests of domain name registrants and due process are
understood, represented, and reflected in the final
analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
__________________________________________________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Graham: As Interim Chair of this WG, while I appreciate your participation in it, our work has not yet started, and when it does start our discussions will hopefully be focused on the very substantive and complex work we have before us. While WG members are of course free to use their experience in domain arbitration and related trademark matters in forming their views and opinions that are transmitted within the context of our discussions and deliberations, this mailing list should not be used to argue specific legal or other disputes that particular WG participants are engaged in with one another, or to make statements that may be construed as personal attacks. I hope you can respect that as we move forward. Thank you. Best, Philip Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal Virtualaw LLC 1155 F Street, NW Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20004 202-559-8597/Direct 202-559-8750/Fax 202-255-6172/Cell Twitter: @VlawDC "Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Graham Schreiber via gnso-rpm-wg Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 1:33 PM To: Winterfeldt, Brian J.; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI Hi Brian & RPM WG: Cc ADR Forum: Brain, having now indulged you're love of art, dining and world travel, on the fees ICANN derives from the lowly .COM Domain Name Registrants, to go globetrotting, perhaps you'll tell the Domain Name Registrants participating in this forum why under You're direction & management, You'd have Steptoe LLP inform a Virginia Court that CentralNic's portfolio of FAKE cc.COMs are: extraterritorial to the Lanham Act? Why too would you simultaneously inform the Court that Network Solutions aren't violating their Contract to / with Domain Name Registrants, when they re-sell { Infringe ~ Dilute & Blur .COM with uk.com<http://uk.com> ~ eu.COM etc } with their own retail client ~ CentralNic's uk.COM Domain Name. Informed as I well know you to be, how is the conduct of both you're clients, not Contributory Infringement, Dilution & Blurring; and also Racketeering? Perhaps in you're capacity as IPC / TM.com Defendant, here in this group { which you should resign from } to be an active Ry/rSG participant ~ explain why Francis Gurry opted to discharge CentralNic as a client, not so very long ago? The 2nd Part of the question to you, also asks of / includes the "Individual" from the ADR Forum this: Why I, as a Domain Name Registrant must "mediate" with another Domain Name Registrant, who's entire business practice is that of "Inducing" Infringement via SUB.COM<http://SUB.COM> Domain's? The ADR Forum should know that when CentralNic "registered" uk.COM with NSI, TLD Registrar Solutions & Demys that their obliged to the same ICANN .COM / RAA rules as all others! Specifically, 3.7.7.9. Is the ADR Forum unaware that being the: solution or remedy to a problem created by the person who contracts them, CentralNic, in the fist degree ~ to solve the problem they created, becoming apparent to the Complainant, through the 2nd Degree, not then actively engaging in Racketeering? To all the other participants in this RPM-WG, I presume / reasonably expect, that you'd all know the .COM is subject to VaED Laws. Given that New Zealander & ICANN'er Mr. Kumar cautions NZ Citizens {and others too} to be aware of their exposure to USA Law, via .COM use.
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/have-com-web-address-know-legal-risks-ck-113355
I'd encourage all the American Attorneys in the group to read SCOTUS 14-1480's "Questions Presented" because above all others, it's You're American Law & American Consumers being "dotCONNED". Stop being scammed by CentralNic; and stop letting them e~VaED proper USA law. Unless, being the clever con-artists CentralNic are, the've got You Americans charmed, so much so, that the USA has surrender sovereignty to ... The British Empire?! SCOTUS 14-1480. https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdf2jYq... In closing, lets remember that under US Common Law, our Marks, Trade Names & Trade Marks are protected in Cyberspace ~ 1st in Use ~ and also that the "NEW gTLDs" are a contracted dimension in Cyberspace, from the NTIA, for ICANN to build and manage in the DNS. Therefore .... the Trademark Clearing House is also an ICANN racket, as our .COMs = Madrid System equivalent Marks, Trade Names & Trademarks in Cyberspace = In Use, in / with .COM, which mean the default "clearing house" should be the .COM availability list. Regards to all. Graham Schreiber. 416.803.4678. <><><><><><><> [comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13] ________________________________ <<< Chronological Index<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/index.h...> >>><https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...> Thread Index<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/threads...> >>><https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...> ________________________________ ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ?? * To: comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13@xxxxxxxxx * Subject: ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ?? * From: Graham Schreiber <graham_schreiber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> * Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:56:33 -0400 ________________________________ Hello ICANN: cc: NTIA, DoC, Jones Day, WIPO, Garth Bruen & Senator Leahy. [[ 4CCA & VAED - for good measure! ]] ICANN, c/o Jones Day: In accordance with your Clients affirmation: "Whereas, ICANN is committed to operating in an open and transparent manner" and my Civil Lawsuit # 13-1812, against your client, for failing to enforce the RAA Sections 3.7.7.3 an 3.7.7.9 ~ I wish to have you oblige my request by furnishing the "agreement(s) between CentralNic and ICANN ..." that WIPO is talking about, just below. For the thoughtful consideration of parties outside ICANN, I'd like to illustrate that other Companies have been "victimized" by CentralNic's "Contributory Infringement" and False Designation ccTLDs, which beyond flaccid ICANN Rules, are directly violating a United States Law # 15 USC § 1125 - False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden, Those four (4) gigantic firms, who've been "fleeced" by WIPO for what amounts to a "Racket" system, accepted by ICANN, to protect CentralNic are: WIPO D2009-1741 Coke-a-Cola WIPO D2013-0746 National Car Rental WIPO D2011-1416 Oakley Glasses WIPO D2012-0249 Zippo From Wikipedia: A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, will not be affected, or would not otherwise exist. Particularly, the potential problem may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this party. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime) As a USPTO "Registered" Trademark Holder, I fully anticipate my "Day in Court" to be granted [ Details at 4CCA Case # 13-1812 ] so that I may bring this injustice; and chronic harming too USPTO Brands to an end. Further; and most critically, as catalyst to this information being made public, it will help the United States Department of Justice, prevent further "harm to American consumers" from occurring, which is their sole purpose. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Graham Schreiber, Pro Se. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian J. via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all: I am an intellectual property attorney and partner in a large international law firm (Mayer Brown LLP), and generally divide my time between our New York and Washington DC offices. My practice primarily focuses on domestic and international trademark law, Internet governance, and domain name matters including both brand protection and advising new gTLD registry operators (including of both .Brand and open generic new gTLDs). Our firm is an authorized Trademark Clearinghouse agent, and we frequently represent clients in a range of industries on internet related matters, including domain name disputes, such as the UDRP and various ccTLD domain dispute processes. I am a member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), for which I recently concluded a four year term as a GNSO Councilor, and have previously served as the IPC Treasurer. I currently also serve on the Board of Directors of the International Trademark Association (INTA), am a member of the project team for the 2016 INTA Annual Meeting, serve as special advisor for INTA’s Internet Committee and previously served four years as co-chair of INTA’s Trademark Administrators Committee Internet Project Team. I have authored and co-authored numerous articles in the fields of trademark law, domain name issues, and Internet governance, and speak frequently on these issues. My full professional biography can be found here<https://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Brian-Winterfeldt/>, and my ICANN Statement of Interest can be found here<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>. I very much look forward to working with you all in the context of this Working Group. Best regards, Brian Brian J. Winterfeldt Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice Mayer Brown LLP bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com<mailto:bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com> 1999 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-1101 202.263.3284<tel:202.263.3284> direct dial 202.830.0330<tel:202.830.0330> fax 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10020-1001 212.506.2345<tel:212.506.2345> direct dial On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> Telephone: +1-603-5744889<tel:%2B1-603-5744889> On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950 (92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too. As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP. Best regards, George Kirikos 416-588-0269<tel:416-588-0269> http://www.leap.com/ On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com<mailto:icann@leap.com>> wrote: Hi folks, (resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly) I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations. Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-0269<tel:416-588-0269> http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg __________________________________________________________________________ This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16 Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Hi Phil, Brian & RPM-WG: Thanks for the email. Please don't misconstrue the fairly & squarely placed question's asked of Brian, as "personal attacks" for they are not. They mirror questions I'd ask of those employed by / funded by "My" Tax Dollar, the equal here being "My" ICANN .COM Domain Name Registration fee. Simply, when one's travels are paid for; and is funded for the express purpose of representing the Intellectual Property Committee and: *"the views and interests of owners of intellectual property worldwide, with a particular emphasis on {ACPA Marks, Trade Names} trademark, copyright, and related intellectual property rights and their effect and interaction with the DNS." * I reasonably expect that work to be done. In my opinion, the problem within ICANN, is that both the IPC & BC Committees are overwhelmingly fortified by people who's primary employment is by R[r]egistry / R[r]egistrar groups. While they're certainly "Businesses" befitting BC, I believe they should stay in their proverbial lane's of RySG / RrSG, being cognizant of the fact the the ".COM" funds ICANN receives are "flow-though" from Domain Name Registrants; and not funds from any other source. Should either Brian, or the ADR Forum take issue with my questions, they're encouraged to express their thoughts in this WG sphere, where I'll gladly engage. This is something the WG might want to know too! In the absence of the American Court doing a proper "*Discovery*" investigation into my Filing's beginning with > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/complaint-31jul12-en.pdf < and all others forward, concluding with > https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdf2jYq... < I'll be using the Canadian Court, where these obligations between USA & Canada are covered by NAFTA. Should, or when a Canadian Filing be made; the National Arbitration Forum / ADR Forum will be a listed Defendant, for their participation, as they know. Additionally, to ensure it's not blown-away based on the American transactions, Brian Winterfeldt will be contending with individualized mention, as he's earlier been apprised. Regards, Graham Schreiber. 416.803.4678. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Phil Corwin <psc@vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
Graham:
As Interim Chair of this WG, while I appreciate your participation in it, our work has not yet started, and when it does start our discussions will hopefully be focused on the very substantive and complex work we have before us.
While WG members are of course free to use their experience in domain arbitration and related trademark matters in forming their views and opinions that are transmitted within the context of our discussions and deliberations, this mailing list should not be used to argue specific legal or other disputes that particular WG participants are engaged in with one another, or to make statements that may be construed as personal attacks. I hope you can respect that as we move forward.
Thank you.
Best, Philip
*Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
*Virtualaw LLC*
*1155 F Street, NW*
*Suite 1050*
*Washington, DC 20004*
*202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
*202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
*202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/Cell*
*Twitter: @VlawDC*
*"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
*From:* gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Graham Schreiber via gnso-rpm-wg *Sent:* Tuesday, March 29, 2016 1:33 PM *To:* Winterfeldt, Brian J.; gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org *Subject:* Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI
Hi Brian & RPM WG: Cc ADR Forum:
Brain, having now indulged you're love of art, dining and world travel, on the fees ICANN derives from the lowly .COM Domain Name Registrants, to go globetrotting, perhaps you'll tell the Domain Name Registrants participating in this forum why under You're direction & management, You'd have Steptoe LLP inform a Virginia Court that CentralNic's portfolio of FAKE cc.COMs are: extraterritorial to the Lanham Act?
Why too would you simultaneously inform the Court that Network Solutions aren't violating their Contract to / with Domain Name Registrants, when they re-sell { Infringe ~ Dilute & Blur .COM with uk.com ~ eu.COM etc } with their own retail client ~ CentralNic's uk.COM Domain Name.
Informed as I well know you to be, how is the conduct of both you're clients, not Contributory Infringement, Dilution & Blurring; and also Racketeering?
Perhaps in you're capacity as IPC / TM.com Defendant, here in this group { which you should resign from } to be an active Ry/rSG participant ~ explain why Francis Gurry opted to discharge CentralNic as a client, not so very long ago?
The 2nd Part of the question to you, also asks of / includes the "Individual" from the ADR Forum this: Why I, as a Domain Name Registrant must "mediate" with another Domain Name Registrant, who's entire business practice is that of "Inducing" Infringement via SUB.COM Domain's?
The ADR Forum should know that when CentralNic "registered" uk.COM with NSI, TLD Registrar Solutions & Demys that their obliged to the same ICANN .COM / RAA rules as all others! Specifically, 3.7.7.9.
Is the ADR Forum unaware that being the: solution or remedy to a problem created by the person who contracts them, CentralNic, in the fist degree ~ to solve the problem they created, becoming apparent to the Complainant, through the 2nd Degree, not then actively engaging in Racketeering?
To all the other participants in this RPM-WG, I presume / reasonably expect, that you'd all know the .COM is subject to VaED Laws. Given that New Zealander & ICANN'er Mr. Kumar cautions NZ Citizens {and others too} to be aware of their exposure to USA Law, via .COM use.
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/have-com-web-address-know-legal-risks-ck-113355
I'd encourage all the American Attorneys in the group to read SCOTUS 14-1480's "Questions Presented" because above all others, it's You're American Law & American Consumers being "dotCONNED".
Stop being scammed by CentralNic; and stop letting them e~VaED proper USA law. Unless, being the clever con-artists CentralNic are, the've got You Americans charmed, so much so, that the USA has surrender sovereignty to ... The British Empire?!
SCOTUS 14-1480.
https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-cwg-naming-transition-01dec14/pdf2jYq...
In closing, lets remember that under US Common Law, our Marks, Trade Names & Trade Marks are protected in Cyberspace ~ 1st in Use ~ and also that the "NEW gTLDs" are a contracted dimension in Cyberspace, from the NTIA, for ICANN to build and manage in the DNS.
Therefore .... the Trademark Clearing House is also an ICANN racket, as our .COMs = Madrid System equivalent Marks, Trade Names & Trademarks in Cyberspace = In Use, in / with .COM, which mean the default "clearing house" should be the .COM availability list.
Regards to all.
Graham Schreiber.
416.803.4678.
<><><><><><><>
[comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13] ------------------------------
<<< Chronological Index <https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/index.h...>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...> Thread Index <https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/threads...>
<https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13/msg0000...>
ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ??
- *To*: comments-atrt2-recommendations-21oct13@xxxxxxxxx - *Subject*: ICANN "agreement(s) for / between CentralNic & WIPO ?? - *From*: Graham Schreiber <graham_schreiber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - *Date*: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 10:56:33 -0400
------------------------------
Hello ICANN: cc: NTIA, DoC, Jones Day, WIPO, Garth Bruen & Senator
Leahy. [[ 4CCA & VAED - for good measure! ]]
ICANN, c/o Jones Day: In accordance with your Clients affirmation:
"Whereas, ICANN is committed to operating in an open and transparent manner"
and my Civil Lawsuit # 13-1812, against your client, for failing to enforce the
RAA Sections 3.7.7.3 an 3.7.7.9 ~ I wish to have you oblige my request by
furnishing the "agreement(s) between CentralNic and ICANN ..." that WIPO is
talking about, just below.
For the thoughtful consideration of parties outside ICANN, I'd like to
illustrate that other Companies have been "victimized" by CentralNic's
"Contributory Infringement" and False Designation ccTLDs, which beyond flaccid
ICANN Rules, are directly violating a United States Law # 15 USC § 1125 - False
designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden,
Those four (4) gigantic firms, who've been "fleeced" by WIPO for what amounts
to a "Racket" system, accepted by ICANN, to protect CentralNic are:
WIPO D2009-1741 Coke-a-Cola
WIPO D2013-0746 National Car Rental
WIPO D2011-1416 Oakley Glasses
WIPO D2012-0249 Zippo
From Wikipedia: A racket is a service that is fraudulently offered to solve a
problem, such as for a problem that does not actually exist, will not be
affected, or would not otherwise exist. Particularly, the potential problem
may be caused by the same party that offers to solve it, although that fact may
be concealed, with the specific intent to engender continual patronage for this
party. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racket_(crime)
As a USPTO "Registered" Trademark Holder, I fully anticipate my "Day in
Court" to be granted [ Details at 4CCA Case # 13-1812 ] so that I may bring
this injustice; and chronic harming too USPTO Brands to an end.
Further; and most critically, as catalyst to this information being made
public, it will help the United States Department of Justice, prevent further
"harm to American consumers" from occurring, which is their sole purpose.
Thank you very much.
Sincerely,
Graham Schreiber, Pro Se.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Winterfeldt, Brian J. via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all:
I am an intellectual property attorney and partner in a large international law firm (Mayer Brown LLP), and generally divide my time between our New York and Washington DC offices. My practice primarily focuses on domestic and international trademark law, Internet governance, and domain name matters including both brand protection and advising new gTLD registry operators (including of both .Brand and open generic new gTLDs). Our firm is an authorized Trademark Clearinghouse agent, and we frequently represent clients in a range of industries on internet related matters, including domain name disputes, such as the UDRP and various ccTLD domain dispute processes.
I am a member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC), for which I recently concluded a four year term as a GNSO Councilor, and have previously served as the IPC Treasurer. I currently also serve on the Board of Directors of the International Trademark Association (INTA), am a member of the project team for the 2016 INTA Annual Meeting, serve as special advisor for INTA’s Internet Committee and previously served four years as co-chair of INTA’s Trademark Administrators Committee Internet Project Team.
I have authored and co-authored numerous articles in the fields of trademark law, domain name issues, and Internet governance, and speak frequently on these issues.
My full professional biography can be found here <https://www.mayerbrown.com/people/Brian-Winterfeldt/>, and my ICANN Statement of Interest can be found here <https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/Brian+Winterfeldt+SOI>.
I very much look forward to working with you all in the context of this Working Group.
Best regards,
Brian
*Brian J. Winterfeldt*
Co-Head of Global Brand Management and Internet Practice
Mayer Brown LLP
bwinterfeldt@mayerbrown.com
1999 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006-1101
202.263.3284 direct dial
202.830.0330 fax
1221 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020-1001
212.506.2345 direct dial
On Mar 25, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg < gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs!
Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines.
In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings.
Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889
On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that
this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and
some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take
a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group
participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a
very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now
appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this
working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that >
the interests of domain name registrants and due process are
understood, represented, and reflected in the final
analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos
416-588-0269
_______________________________________________
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list
gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
__________________________________________________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
------------------------------
No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2016.0.7303 / Virus Database: 4540/11804 - Release Date: 03/12/16 Internal Virus Database is out of date.
Hi all, I'm looking forward to working with you on this. I am a UK IP lawyer by background and am Head of Legal Policy for Valideus. We provide new gTLD consultancy and registry management services to prospective and existing new gTLD registry operators and have advised clients on the implementation of the RPMs as part of their ICANN compliance obligations. Valideus' sister company, Com Laude, is a corporate registrar which provides domain name management and online brand management services to businesses, and acts as an official Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) agent. Prior to joining Valideus in 2014, I was responsible for brand protection, including the registration and enforcement strategy for domains within new gTLDs, at media company BBC Worldwide. Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd 28-30 Little Russell Street London, WC1A 2HN, United Kingdom E: susan.payne@valideus.com D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 -----Original Message----- From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong via gnso-rpm-wg Sent: 25 March 2016 17:02 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rpm-wg] GNSO RPM Working Group Introductions/SOI Thank you so much, George, and hello everybody, welcome to the Policy Development Process Working Group that’s been chartered by the GNSO Council to review all the rights protection mechanisms (RPMs) that have been developed for all gTLDs! Staff will be working with our interim WG chair and Council liaison, Philip Corwin, to set up the first meeting of the Working Group, currently anticipated to be sometime around mid-April. Some of you will have already participated in previous GNSO Working Groups, while others may be less familiar with the procedures and expectations, so staff will also be scheduling a webinar at around the same time to go over the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) and the GNSO’s Working Group Guidelines. In the meantime, given that there are indeed a large number of members and observers to this Working Group, it will be helpful if others follow George’s lead and take the opportunity to introduce yourselves, your expertise and interest in this PDP, to everyone via this email list. As with all GNSO mailing lists, all messages are publicly archived so you will be able to look up others’ (and your own) information and postings. Finally, if you haven’t already filled in your Statement of Interest - which is one of the few requirements for participation in a GNSO Working Group - we would greatly appreciate it if you can do so at your earliest convenience. Please follow this link to either create a new SOI or update an existing one: https://community.icann.org/x/cYLg. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: mary.wong@icann.org Telephone: +1-603-5744889 On 3/25/16, 12:53, "gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of George Kirikos via gnso-rpm-wg" <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org on behalf of gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Just to followup on my earlier "introduction" email, it appears that this working group is up to 129 participants (and counting), see:
https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=58729950
(92 members + 37 observers) It's great to see some familiar names, and some new ones too.
As folks relax over this long holiday weekend, you might want to take a moment to introduce yourself to your fellow working group participants with a short email to the list, for what I hope will be a very productive PDP.
Best regards,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:15 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
(resending the email from this morning, as the mailing list now appears to be working properly)
I've followed ICANN for many years, and am volunteering on this working group as an independent. My Statement of Interest is at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsosoi/George+Kirikos+SOI
I look forward to a review and reform of RPMs in such a manner that > the interests of domain name registrants and due process are understood, represented, and reflected in the final analysis/recommendations.
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Hello Everyone,Let me please introduce myself. I'm a professor of Law, head of Lebanese Information Technology Association (NGO), member of the Cyber security Panel at the World Federation of Scientists, and Founder of the Pan Arab Observatory for Cyber Security. I am extremely interested in Internet Governance issues and ICANN work from a legal and economic angles, and particularly implicated in building capacity and teaching of: cyber security, safe internet, cyber crime, right and civil liberties on internet. I think that being part of this group may afford me a chance to work on a subject of passion: "rights in Cyber space". Mona Al achkar Jabbour
participants (12)
-
Darcy Southwell -
Dr. Mona Al-achkar JAbbour -
George Kirikos -
Graham Schreiber -
Marina Lewis -
Mary Wong -
Petter Rindforth -
Phil Corwin -
Roger Doumanian -
Steven Levy -
Susan Payne -
Winterfeldt, Brian J.