PLEASE READ: RPM Working Group call next week, outstanding Action Items
Dear Working Group members, The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call. Please do so by the close of your business day on Monday 31 July so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call. If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition. Additional notes/reminders: Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details. There are also a few outstanding Action Items from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on: * From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims... * From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB Thanks and cheers Mary
Hi Mary, Yes, I will attend. Cyntia King Modern IP, LLC On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 1:24 PM -0500, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: Dear Working Group members, The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call. Please do so by the close of your business day on Monday 31 July so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call. If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition. Additional notes/reminders: Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details. There are also a few outstanding Action Items from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on:
From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims...
From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB
Thanks and cheers Mary
I am available On Friday, July 28, 2017, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Working Group members,
The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, *please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call*. Please do so by the close of your business day on *Monday 31 July* so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call.
If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition.
*Additional notes/reminders*:
Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details.
There are also a few *outstanding Action Items* from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on:
- From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/ download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims%20Sub% 20Team%20report%20-%20updated%2020%20July.docx?version=1& modificationDate=1501266083536&api=v2 <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims...>
- From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB <https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB>
Thanks and cheers
Mary
-- *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)* E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member, Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member, OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member Email: wisdom.dk@gmail.com Skype: wisdom_dk facebook: facebook@wisdom_dk Website: www.data.gov.gh www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
Yes, I can attend. I hear they're giving out gold stars for perfect attendance.... ;-) However, instead of having 20 or 30 "Yes, I can attend" emails clogging up the mailing list, might i suggest that it would be better (next time) to have done this via a Doodle poll, etc? Sincerely, George Kirikos 416-588-026 http://www.leap.com/ On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Working Group members,
The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call. Please do so by the close of your business day on Monday 31 July so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call.
If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition.
Additional notes/reminders:
Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details.
There are also a few outstanding Action Items from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on:
From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims...
From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB
Thanks and cheers
Mary
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
+1 to George suggestion On Friday, July 28, 2017, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
Yes, I can attend. I hear they're giving out gold stars for perfect attendance.... ;-)
However, instead of having 20 or 30 "Yes, I can attend" emails clogging up the mailing list, might i suggest that it would be better (next time) to have done this via a Doodle poll, etc?
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-026 http://www.leap.com/
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org <javascript:;>> wrote:
Dear Working Group members,
The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call. Please do so by the close of your business day on Monday 31 July so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call.
If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition.
Additional notes/reminders:
Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details.
There are also a few outstanding Action Items from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on:
From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/ Trademark%20Claims%20Sub%20Team%20report%20-%20updated% 2020%20July.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1501266083536&api=v2
From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB
Thanks and cheers
Mary
_______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <javascript:;> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org <javascript:;> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
-- *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)* E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member, Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member, OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member Email: wisdom.dk@gmail.com Skype: wisdom_dk facebook: facebook@wisdom_dk Website: www.data.gov.gh www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh
Hi Mary and Amr I note the proposal to start discussing the Preamble sections and Q1 from the Sunrise Report. Could you please post the final version of this Report to the WG wiki page in a self-evident location (or point me to it if I have missed it, which is quite possible). When documents tend to be posted on the page for the meeting at which they are to be discussed this is obviously useful for the purposes of that discussion, but makes it difficult to locate the correct version after the event. The section “WG Documents (drafts/polls)” would seem an obvious place perhaps? Thanks Susan Susan Payne Head of Legal Policy | Valideus Ltd E: susan.payne@valideus.com<mailto:susan.payne@valideus.com> D: +44 20 7421 8255 T: +44 20 7421 8299 M: +44 7971 661175 From: gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: 28 July 2017 19:25 To: gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] PLEASE READ: RPM Working Group call next week, outstanding Action Items Dear Working Group members, The co-chairs wish to find out if it will be feasible to hold a Working Group call next week. As such, please respond to this email if you plan to attend the call. Please do so by the close of your business day on Monday 31 July so that a decision can be made as to whether to proceed with the call. If the call does proceed, a likely agenda will focus on those Preamble questions, and if time permits, Question 1, all from the Sunrise report – note that these questions were not identified as requiring data collection as a pre-condition. Additional notes/reminders: Staff and the co-chairs are continuing to work on the data collection suggestions for Sunrise. A number of those suggestions can be combined either because they target the same audience or sources, or because the exercise will likely utilize the same methodology. Some proposals will also require professional assistance (e.g. survey design). The Working Group should expect to see a collated proposal document in the next couple of weeks containing these additional details. There are also a few outstanding Action Items from the last two Working Group calls, which we hope you can review and comment on: * From 19 July – edits to the Trademark Claims document, updated and circulated by staff on 20 July to address suggestions made on the Working Group call of 19 July: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/66091891/Trademark%20Claims... * From 26 July – Sunrise data collection suggestions and links to UDRP and URS decisions on design marks (provided by Griffin Barnett): https://community.icann.org/x/BwAhB Thanks and cheers Mary
participants (5)
-
Cking Modern IP -
George Kirikos -
Mary Wong -
Susan Payne -
Wisdom Donkor