Dear All, Please see below the action items captured by staff from the RPM PDP Working Group meeting on 27 October 2020 at 13:00 UTC. Staff will post these to the wiki space. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, Zoom chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/RARPMRIAGPWG/2020-10-27+Review+of+all+Ri.... Best Regards, Mary, Ariel, and Julie == Action Items: TMCH Recommendation Final Recommendation #1: ACTION ITEM: WG members to review the revised text captured by staff based on the WG’s discussion at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aSFKsXW9Z3CfBODC_T_7kY_rCVo_pTkiWUH0cFG1..., page 28, and note factual errors/omissions, if any, on the list by Thursday, 29 October, 16:00 UTC. Cover Page and Next Steps: ACTION ITEM: Staff will check the consistency of the wording in the Cover Page and Next Steps text. WG members to review the revised Next Steps text captured by staff based on the WG’s discussion at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HaCI2EkvIS9ejSGrS1YslCY9ZTOHvbxBc3pIdiUL..., and note factual errors/omissions, if any, on the list by Thursday, 29 October, 16:00 UTC. Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest: -- Greg Shatan: Member of the At-Large Advisory Committee. -- Stepping down from the GNSO Standing Selection Committee (SSC). 2. TMCH Recommendation Final Recommendation #1: TMCH Validation Provider: -- This is the terminology used in the Initial and Final Report. It is the correct term as staff has confirmed with GDS. -- Staff recommends going with Validation Provider. Contextual Language: -- WG members, including Paul Tattersfield, Rebecca Tushnet, and Griffin Barnett, suggested further edits, which staff has captured in the revised text at the link below. ACTION ITEM: WG members to review the revised text captured by staff based on the WG’s discussion at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aSFKsXW9Z3CfBODC_T_7kY_rCVo_pTkiWUH0cFG1..., page 28, and note factual errors/omissions, if any, on the list by Thursday, 29 October, 16:00 UTC. 3. Review draft Final Report – please review only the new highlighted text in the Google docs at the links below and in the following order: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1R99_8v0BYmIRV...> Approach Taken by the Working Group [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1HJFo7JwmYH-Mc...> Annex G - Community Input [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1NkHqpcBY0RFy_...> Annex E - Working Group Documents [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1eNSJ9UWv0iBJ7...> -- The WG found no factual errors or corrections in these sections. COVER PAGE [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1CULo0JvPSHqtk...> and Next Steps [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1HaCI2EkvIS9ej...> -- WG members noted that the cover page says the report has been submitted and the next steps says it will be submitted - may want to coordinate those two. ACTION ITEM: Staff will check the consistency of the wording in the Cover Page and Next Steps text. WG members to review the revised Next Steps text captured by staff based on the WG’s discussion at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HaCI2EkvIS9ejSGrS1YslCY9ZTOHvbxBc3pIdiUL..., and note factual errors/omissions, if any, on the list by Thursday, 29 October, 16:00 UTC. 4. AOB: URS Final Recommendations #3 and #4: -- Staff and WG members agree that the recommendations are consistent, and there were no new changes or language introduced by staff after the WG’s agreement.