Recirculating Deloitte's response to Working Group follow up questions
Hello everyone, At our co-chairs’ request, staff is recirculating the responses we received recently from Deloitte on the follow up questions that our Working Group had sent to them prior to the Copenhagen meeting. You can also find the response, along with the data Deloitte presented to us in Copenhagen, the Analysis Group’s revised report, and other Working Group documents discussing the TMCH at this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw. Thanks and cheers Mary
I find it very troubling that Deloitte makes no effort to classify the nature of the trademark. This is done by virtually every governmental registry so I don't understand their rationale. I am also troubled by their responses to the examples. Again, there seems to be no differential as to whether the mark is a simple text (word only) mark or otherwise. Sent from my iPad
On 28 Apr 2017, at 03:15, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Hello everyone,
At our co-chairs’ request, staff is recirculating the responses we received recently from Deloitte on the follow up questions that our Working Group had sent to them prior to the Copenhagen meeting. You can also find the response, along with the data Deloitte presented to us in Copenhagen, the Analysis Group’s revised report, and other Working Group documents discussing the TMCH at this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw.
Thanks and cheers Mary <Deloitte Responses to Follow Up Questions.pdf> _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
Dear Working Group Members, I am recirculating an email sent by Mary to the WG mailing list on 28 April, along with an attachment (attached to the original email) containing responses from Deloitte to questions raised by the WG. These questions cover some issues concerning the TMCH verification process (including clarifications on how proof-of-use is accepted), the TMCH dispute resolution procedures, Design Marks and marks protected by statute or treaty (including geographical indications, protected designations of origin and protected appellations of origin). For more documents relevant to the TMCH discussion, please follow the link provided below. I hope you find this helpful. Thanks. Amr From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Friday, April 28, 2017 at 3:14 AM To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Recirculating Deloitte's response to Working Group follow up questions Hello everyone, At our co-chairs’ request, staff is recirculating the responses we received recently from Deloitte on the follow up questions that our Working Group had sent to them prior to the Copenhagen meeting. You can also find the response, along with the data Deloitte presented to us in Copenhagen, the Analysis Group’s revised report, and other Working Group documents discussing the TMCH at this wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/_pHRAw[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_-5FpHRAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DZVUAuc1juldSXNq8YmDoadUOY0MfYdjlopAUQyOxRQ&m=4Lb28HjleJpgsJ2LujX2_MvdoBVfcjaEAxf6TZXTC3k&s=LrsTQf2TzymxT8tRV90yVFwuxqOtDIq3pp4kumBP0FE&e=>. Thanks and cheers Mary
participants (3)
-
Amr Elsadr -
Mary Wong -
Paul Keating