Dear Working Group Members, Below are the action items from the WG call on 12 July. The action items, notes, meeting documents, recordings and transcripts can all also be found on the meeting wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Z2jwAw Thanks. Amr Action Items: Action Items for WG members: 1. WG to develop a definition for “Standard Pricing” 2. WG to follow up with a revision of the definition for “Premium Pricing”, to reflect higher prices for Premium Names 3. WG to suggest rewording for Q3 (refined) in the Sunrise Registrations document to include the ability of TM owners to challenge the classification of terms as Reserved Names as well as Premium Names, taking into account the fact that Premium Names may also be Reserved Names. Consider also whether use of the word "release" is appropriate in this context 4. WG to consider how best to rephrase TM Claims refined Q1 & 2, to more clearly delineate between the intent and effect of a Claims Notice and a Notice of Registered Name Action Items for staff/co-chairs: 1. Staff to add “unfairly” to the second bullet of Sunrise Registrations refined question 2, so that it reads “Is there evidence that Registry Sunrise or Premium Name pricing unfairly limits trademark owners’ ability to participate during Sunrise?” 2. Staff to include Maxim’s comment on the scope of the ICANN “picket fence” in the document in reference to Q3 (refined) for Sunrise Registrations 3. Staff to archive the original Charter questions for Sunrise Registrations and use the reworded questions from now on, keeping the new comments from Johannesburg and deleting the older ones that have been resolved (the original questions and older comments will be recorded in an Annex for a comprehensive record) 4. Staff to post INTA survey results to the RPM WG wiki 5. Staff and co-chairs to review the Sunrise data collection questions to determine which would be easier, quicker and more of a priority to collect, to inform the order in which the WG tackles the refined Charter questions